snova4

Nearly every chant that is used could be found offensive in some way. This thread is ridiculous.

I'm not arguing the penalty, just the five minutes. It just looked to be me watching at home, on the one replay they showed, that the husky played it up pretty well.

Wow. Just wow. Looked like shoulder contact and a flop at home. But what do I know.

I struggle even watching away broadcasts. These two clowns are as bad as Gopher announcers.

Speaking oof loud, they had the anthem on TV last night. Holy smokes did Sioux drown out everything in that building. Embarrassing to be a Huskie and have that done to you in your own building. Pretty sure that's just a home game in "according to the homer announcers" one of the best rinks in the country. Cute.

Which one is the Red Hawk and which one is the Fighting Hawk?

I'm just happy my workwork computer doesn't block it anymore.

Their station will take you to I heart radio.

All those goals and Poganski can't get one. I'm terrible at this.

I can tell you who my least favorite is.

one can only hope so.

Doesn't have to be exactly like that logo either to have influence if people hope that it's similar. Sigh

Didn't realize asking for clarification was degrading. Besides that, telling people to DEAL with it comes off as extremely condescending. Maybe my tone comes off as degrading/condescending, but I believe that would only be in response to which I've been spoken to. So, deal with it.

Which is it? Does the logo not have anything to do with the vote, if so, this statement is 100% contradictory, otherwise I'm unsure of what exactly you're arguing. You can't say in one post that the logo that's been circulating has nothing to do with a vote for Fighting Hawks, and in the very next post say that there will be pressure to have a logo similar to it. Edited because of auto correct.

That only leads me to believe you either don't have social media, don't pay attention, or are flat out lying.

Isn't that the truth.

All of you assuming this logo had no effect on the vote, remember this is the same fan base that thought having the congressional branch of our state government pass legislation mandating keeping the Fighting Sioux would change the NCAA's mind. Come on, you're giving the low hanging fruit of this fan base far too much credit.

Well, what proof I do have is a small sampling size of an albeit large family in the Grand Forks area that were/are voting Hawks because o of that logo. I even had a friend not connected to the University in any way, shape, or form text that logo to me congratulating me on UND's sweet new logo. So tell me, are these educated people surrounding me closet idiots, or are you vastly underestimating the power that logo has had on this process?

If you honestly believe that logo hasn't significantly affected this voting process,I have ocean front property in Nebraska to sell you.

With the Hawks logo that was circulating, I can say this, my wife is a multiple time graduate of UND, born and raised in Grand Forks, and it took me until this final vote to convince her that the Blackhawks logo that was circulating had less than a snowball's chance in **** of ever being the logo. Now, someone that knows Kelley as well as her, and understands this process took that long to convince that logo wouldn't happen, how many others do you think are voting based on that logo? I'd say at a minimum, a solid 50% of the Fighting Hawk vote. That's what saddens me, because you think their are people mad about this process now, just wait until they finally realize that the logo they thought was attached to that nickname is not being used.

Don't live in either, so that's not really a concern at the moment. If I have to, I'll drive.

Wife and I already talked about it, this is happening for us. Couple of my friends are already in also. Will be a fun weekend. Now to wait for tickets to go on sale.

Pogo.

This young of a team, running on the third string practice goalie? Yeah, I'll take it.

Bryn.