Siouxphan27

I disagree. There's nothing cheap about women's hockey.

But on the bright side, we'll still have women's hockey.

I was thinking it looked like a typical Vikings 4th quarter performance.

Biggest excitement of the night was the missed empty netter. Not a good sign.

I'm willing to pay $6 apiece right now for anyone's regional tickets. just PM me.

holy Yon looking tired.

thinking outside the box. I like it.

I'm not an expert by any means; it was merely a suggestion, if indeed it's allowed.

We should score more goals.

Blame Trump?

Has anyone floated this idea by Kennedy?

#RollTurds

Seems to be a lot of concern about having to keep women's hockey solely because of men's hockey. How do the top notch football universities ever get in compliance with title IX? My guess is they make sure they offer enough scholarships to offset in women's sports, and make sure their women's athletic facilities are nice. End of story. Alabama for instance has a women's rowing team with 58 members on the roster. I don't know if they're rowing for Carnival Cruise lines, but if not, 58 seems a bit excessive. I'm thinking it's their way of offsetting football, giving equal scholarships to women. It seems to work just fine for them.

Tomato tomato.

The perception of not valuing women's hockey in grand forks can be seen every other weekend with the 11500 empty seats at the Ralph; the community doesn't value it, women clearly don't value it so how can it be a title IX sacred cow? If cut, there should be no complaining from a community that refuses to support a sport this expensive for UND.

I hope you're right. I however don't get the same vibe as you do from Kennedy that he is some sort of methodical mastermind and has this all figured out.

So which do you use if you're a lactating gender neutral with a disability?

a sugar beet trophy made of crystal...

plus, they've already got Minard Hall.

I loved that; ndsu student housing. lol.

We don't want that smelly town do we?

Love it! Hooker!

probably should just foul on purpose before someone shoots. seems automatic they'll get a call

I'm starting to wonder if the refs get paid by the foul.