Old Fella

taken

I have 2 tix available for tonight (11/6) in the lower bowl right over the Zamboni. $50 for both ($25 ea)

Woe unto those who live in the 'wreckage of the future'.

Eyerone is entitled to there option/even if it is wrong

What? this does a lot to your credibility on any blog.

Much to my dismay I hear the cart coming down the hall/must be time to take my meds/if I may be so presumptuous may I suggest others may want to get back on theirs?

As I recall free speech does not include shouting 'fire in a crowded theater'. (assuming there is no fire) In the context we are addressing It does include using the dreaded "S" word at a sporting event.

It seems some believe there are no limits to what the NCAA or can not do/my guess is that any sanction based on 'freedom of speech', (which is what fans would be doing if they used the dreaded "S" word) would not pass the 'laugh test'. Even the Attorney General couldn't lose that case.

Too old to keep living in 'the wreckage of the future'.

A little background/Have been watching/supporting UND athletics for the past 60 years/hockey season ticket holder since the old Ralph was built. Have never wore merchandise with Sioux on it/nor to I shout Sioux at the end of the national anthem of join in with 'Lets go Sioux. Merely trying to bring some common sense to the issue.

Relax! Let,s say, the new name is Sundogs/fans still wear Sioux merchandise and shout out Sioux. Do we still get sanctions?

What are the 'best scheduling practices'? Regardless of what new name the team is given, does anyone on this blog believe that some 8,000 of the 11,000 fans at the hockey games are going to stop wearing the Sioux merchandise or shouting out Sioux when their spirit calls them?

What would those sanctions be?

Anyone know of ma good Watch site on Marco Island?

This tread would not exist if the Sioux had won 1 game.

What else is there to Say?

Win gets them to 12.

Was at both Friday/Saturday games. Both nights Hak sent the team out with his coaching philosophy/conservative and play not to lose. Friday 8 minutes without shot on goal/Saturday 12 minutes without shot on goal. Seems to me the line O'Donnell was on Friday night scored 2 of the 4 goals/surprised he changed that line for Saturdays game. IMO the Sioux are a far better team than CC if they are allowed to play aggressive hockey.

Thompson

Should quit the talk of not making changes/after all going 11-1 Hak took Caggs of the Rocco line/not sure how that worked.

Question? are coaches allowed to motivate the team? Just asking.

Harvard beats B/U/Sioux now 18 in pairwise.

My memory not that good/seem to have read Blais had won a national championship not long before the 2001--02 season