scpa0305

In both his freshman and soph years he improved so much. He was on the top PP unit….which he will be again this year. KT is a very good season. Given his age, I could see him having a very productive season if he stays this year.

I couldn't disagree more.

Interesting....Berry needs to scoop that kid quick.

If Red River officially changes their nickname I'd go for Rough Riders, however not until that happens.

Pride is starting to grow on me. However I still think I'm in the no new nickname grouping.

NA kid, Wolanin, Chartrand

Gotcha.

Who get's cut?

This fall? I guess they are not considering UND then.

Many hockey analysts would disagree with your last statement.

Good guy that loves hockey and absolutely bleeds green. He definitely fell into a nice little situation here but I've heard he works real hard. Pretty shocked myself. Everyone needs a start sometime....his is just pretty nice

Oh man. Great player...not so sure he'd make a great coach...pretty rough around the edges. Once Matt Greene retires I could see him coming back.

Haha I knew I butchered that name. I am from GF...this is bad Brain fart. Couldn't delete it fast enough, you boys are quick to the trigger. Nick....haha

I wish Eric Fuher would get a looksy.

No, you have to keep this tight to the chest. Younger (more immature) players may not realize this but the more mature players will realize this. All the players love Berry, hopefully Boeser doesn't bounce.

No way. He needs to hire experienced (NHL) assistants.

It's berry.

He would be a great choice. What's funny is we my hire someone who many posters have been bashing for the last 3-4 years .

Guentzel?

Wow and Hak is a departure. Nice call Truenorth!

Oh jeez...guys on the inside. I like it.

It's one game. Wow. Also, Tampa is a super fun team to watch.

So poganski doesn't even crack your lineup? . I think he may get a shot at a top 6 role. Also, you have too many freshman in that lineup. Simonson would play well above Gardner (who I don't believe will be coming in, although I could be wrong). Caggs-Schmaltz-chyzk Boeser-Johnson-poganski Gersich-Simonson- Murphy Olson-st Clair- wilkie (My first draft, I have a feeling the Finnish kid works his way into the lineup) Ladue-Thompson Stetcher-Ausmus Poolman- wolanin/shaw (rotating) Pp1 Caggulia-schmaltz-boeser Ladue-Thompson Pp2 Gersich-Johnson-Wilkie Stetcher-poolman

Nah, he simply lost one draw. He actually won a lot of draws playing center for us. The biggest factor was simply the lack of effort on the ice getting back (the forward group and D). It was fluky because there should be no way in heck they score that goal with that amount of time left.....not 5x5. It was a hockey goal (most are kind of fluky). If the boys were buzzing they wouldn't even got it in our zone in that amount of time.

Agreed. But I have played the game a little and that's how he should have played it perfectly. If there was 5 minutes on the clock I agree he could have played it the way he played it and everything should have been fine. We'll agree to disagree then, I try not to knock my favorites.