NoiseInsideMyHead

Typo, or Freudian slip.

I think we should call out people for profiteering on here. It's tacky, and oh, by the way, violates the forum guidelines (the spirit, if not the letter).

Well, the only willing buyer here appears to have pegged it at $100. But if there isn't a willing seller, the world may never know.

I wasn't aware it was back on the market.

We could adopt the Star of David (Hakstol). It frequently starts out dim, looks great most of the astrological year, and fades out right at the end when everyone is watching, only to have the faithful looking skyward the very next night.

MARKET VALUE - "[T]he estimated amount for which a property should exchange on the date of valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm's-length transaction after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently, and without compulsion." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_value

The current weather forecast alone should knock about $50 off your selling price.

I saw the end of that link (_xl.jpg) and immediately wondered whether this was SFW.

Total diss from the national media. http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/ncaa-hockey-101--reasons-to-be-skeptical-of-north-dakota-s-quality-011752215.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter I say, bring it.

Hypothetical: If UND clinches on Friday, do Zane and other starters sit on Saturday?

Fixed your post.

There are a lot of reasons why the students might be angry. The nickname. The cancellation of Springfest. The extended hours at the student union and library. Dorm food. The weather. Taxes. The proliferation of ISIS. The list goes on and on...

Love 'em or hate 'em, shootouts matter. Omaha has picked up the equivalent of a win by going 3-for-3, while Duluth has lost an entire game in the standings by going 0-for-3. In the crazy NCHC, this could be the difference between home ice for the first round and hitting the road.

Good catch. Although I suspect they have oodles of wiggle room on that point, too. Will be interesting to hear the whole story (i.e., from the ousted students), if it ever comes out.

Lots of room for subjectivity on the part of the venue here, unfortunately.

"Banners and Signs" Banners and signs are welcome inside Ralph Engelstad Arena. To ensure that these articles do not distract from the enjoyment of other fans, Ralph Engelstad Arena requests that guests adhere to the following guidelines: Banners/signs should in no way infringe on the sightlines of other Ralph Engelstad Arena guests. Banners and signs may not be commercial, political, derogatory or obscene as determined by REA staff. Signs must not utilize wood or metal material or other types of objects for support. Banners/signs cannot be affixed to building surfaces using tape and must fit underneath a patron’s seat. Ralph Engelstad Arena reserves the right to remove any banner or sign.

http://www.theralph.com/guest-services/a-z-guide "Prohibited Items... Any unauthorized signs." Clearly, the banner was not authorized.

If ya gotta ditch in the ocean, couldn't pick a better spot than alongside a cruise ship. Poor Tom Hanks had to endure his ride to salvation aboard a freighter.

Great find! I think it would be interesting if they expanded the study to include ice sheet availability (we just opened two top-flite rinks at ICON) and youth hockey participation per capita.

You can usually get a free change if an involuntary rescheduling by the airline doesn't work for you. Might be worth a look.

Are we absolutely sure the school wasn't around 14 years earlier? Like maybe just a building or a classroom or something?

To be clear, C is not having a nickname which, to my knowledge, violates absolutely no regulation, policy, rule, or bylaw which would subject UND to any NCAA sanction whatsoever.

Hence the circularity and the flawed logic. UND by definition cannot be on the naughty list, because it no longer has a Native American nickname. That clause presupposed that if UND didn't select a new name, it would retain Sioux. If A, then B. A purely binary system. Which obviously it is not. The parties to the contract simply didn't anticipate C. Arbitrary and capricious penalties just don't pass the smell test, even for the big, bad NCAA.

My reaction to the strict literalist crowd is "So what." If no name constitutes a breach of the settlement agreement -- and I do mean IF, as it is not entirely clear -- then the NCAA's remedy is a legal action for breach of contract. But what nobody has been able to articulate is what the NCAA's damages are, or whether there is any sufficient economic justification for the NCAA to pursue the case. I tend to think that once UND got off the naughty list, the NCAA's leverage all but disappeared. Forcing UND to pick a name is a hugely extraordinary step that I don't see a court taking. Should nominal damages be awarded to the NCAA, I will be the first to pony up a dollar.

In fairness, I think that UND and REA stood shoulder to shoulder when the NCAA relented on the existing imagery at the arena. The original settlement was much more draconian.