UNDBIZ

Who's more likely to take the "student" portion of "student athlete" seriously? The 18 year old 1st round draft pick likely leaving after his sophomore year or the 21 year old undrafted kid likely to stick around for 4+ years? If college is truly about educating students, the B1G is on the wrong side of this one.

Not quite... People have been threatening to pull donations for a decade and the Alumni Foundation keeps getting more.

Unfortunately, Notre Dame's interlocking ND probably belongs in the above list as well.

The final 2 minutes of a basketball game has to be the worst thing in sports.

Nope. If they want to fill their bowl game, we're not taking a financial loss. NC$$ can cover it.

Get that money.

Keep throwing up bricks and we'll have a new football stadium in no time. 19-6 with 12 to go in the first

Favored?!?! Then forget covering, just win!

What's the spread? #JustCover

When it comes to having a name as bland and generic as Hawks, the #1 for me for the logo will be uniqueness.

We don't. One poster mentioned their schollies should be reduced/removed and used elsewhere. Hypothetical.

The accent helps, but not quite enough IMO. Maybe a bolder accent? When the image is shrunk down (for hats, polos, etc) the eye kind of gets lost and is hard to differentiate from the other "random" sections of white and green on the head. Perhaps a couple of those need to be removed? Especially the white ones near the eye. Maybe try removing the white spots above and below the eye, and the left half of the one to the right of the eye. I think when it's shrunk down, the eye needs to be clear to avoid the appearance of it being just a black blob with random spots of color.

I prefer the one with the black-tipped beak. I still think something needs to be done with the back feather, I'd either shrink or remove it. When the logo is shrunk down, it can end up looking like a beaked black blob. Perhaps it should be done in more of a charcoal gray so it doesn't drown out the other colors so much? Maybe make the eye all white rather than having the color strip at the bottom. Also, try coloring the area around the eye to make it more distinct. I'd also be interested in seeing it with heavier outlining/more color on the lower feathers to make them a bit more distinct.

WOW even Hajdu getting involved. Committee must've REALLY screwed the football team.

Agreed. Taubs was a bit shaky this year, and he seemed to lose some power from last year, but we know he is a capable kicker. Hopefully he has a good offseason in the IPF.

So you're going to march out a half dozen excuses on how the weather beat SDSU, rather than WIU, and then still say the WIU victory meant more than UND's win ON THE ROAD over a SEEDED team that slaughtered one FBS opponent AND beat the #2 team in the PAC 12 North? The MVFC is good, but there are some very good teams outside of it. Take off the blinders.... or at least try to be consistent in your argument. NDSU lost to that powerhouse USD. Is NDSU not good?

His point still stands.

A quality loss there would significantly boost our resume. We don't want to beat too many good teams on our schedule, or else they won't be considered good anymore.

He is one of 10 semifinalists for the award....

Previous winners include Justin Blackmon, Marquise Lee, Brandin Cooks, and Amari Cooper. If Lewis wins that, I don't think we need to worry about him being on their roster next year.

http://siouxfb.areavoices.com/2015/11/23/und-thumps-poly-not-selected-for-playoffs/

Whoever the Big Sky's rep on the selection committee was, it appears he spends too much of his day reading bisonswille and AGS.

The first time a 6 win team has EVER made the playoffs, for a team with no wins against a seeded opponent no less. And they booted a 7-4 team with an FBS win and a win against a seeded team to do it.

This isn't making me less angry....

As long as they're still committed to the team and they're putting in the work, the team should remain committed to them. Just my opinion.