Specifically.....
-Chaves can stop hiring internally instead of conducting a national search. In WBB, Brewster was replaced internally by Mallory. The results speak for themselves and they are ugly. He just went internal to replace the non-renewed soccer coach. Maybe he'll get lucky on that one, but I am guessing not likely.
-Chaves can stop giving coaches an infinite amount of time to build their programs. How many years should Sather get? Mallory? Any thoughts on that? The last extension he gave Bubba was outrageous. And it cost us $750K to get out of.
-All the bells and whistles (facilities upgrades) are great and will help all programs recruit quality student-athletes. But if we have coaches in charge of programs that are underperforming (their players don't get better from one year to the next, they don't seem prepared for a particular opponent), I don't think they will be as successful as they should be.
-UND hockey has won a bunch of Penrose Cups, but national level success has been lacking for 9 long years. Fair or not (and I don't know if it is fair), national success is what people remember. We are becoming irrelevant nationally. And the longer we are, the harder it will be to fix it.
-Isn't the 1883 collective run by people outside the UND umbrella? Maybe I am wrong about that?
-We have become irrelevant compared to the other 3 Dakota schools. NDSU is celebrating another FCS title, before that, SDSU won back to back FCS titles. I think Schmidt can and will turn it around, but we wasted a lot of years and money waiting for Bubba to get it turned around. And it will make Schmidt's job that much more challenging. In basketball, all the other Dakota schools have had some national success in WBB and/or MBB. Our women's team isn't even in the same galaxy as either South Dakota school. March Madness would be a huge boon for this entire athletic department and all of UND in general, but you have to get there first.
-Finally, this whole concept that as long as the student-athletes are doing well in the classroom and the community, wins and losses are basically irrelevant, is a ridiculous false choice. You don't have to give up one to have the other. Yet, this false choice is spread on this forum by some contributors (they know who they are). I don't think we have to go to the Rutgers model, where we have great academics and athletic teams that are (with a few exceptions) mediocre.
But please, continue insisting that UND athletics is flying high and everything is "sol-id". Just don't expect me and others to buy into it.