bison73

Contractor---as in construction correct? Its not construction related.

I think most would agree.

I first need to clarify----my source told me about the company that didnt get paid. He knows the company and people very well. My sources company is the one whose projects were delayed. I asked that same question. Answer--because thats how they do business. They will get paid eventually but money is tight right now. They also have contracts in the future and dont want to jeopardize those. But will go through the same scenario with those. Plus they are delaying other projects because of money..

Shoddy work? Then why would UND keep doing business with that company? Your ignorance of the current situation at UND is astounding. It you who believes UND is above reproach in its business dealing without knowing the facts.

I dont need to make a request. The information is out there. Of course you would need to know where to look and which dept. But as Ive said--I already know so why would I need to make a request?

Fact is it was legal. No flag. Perry should have played to the whistle. Dont care what Bohl did or didnt do. Didnt see the show. My post has to do with it being a good play or not. Not trying to rewrite history. Ive had that same stance since it happened. Dont care what some Bison fans had to say about it. They have never payed the game ,because that type of action takes place on a regular basis and is a legal block..

That was a perfectly good play. The player was playing to the whistle and Perry let up just as the guy went low to cut him. But just because he got hurt their were some Bison fans that were upset about it and called it dirty etc.

Dont care. Hes at Wyoming.

Dont know.

Do you have a link for the replay?

Dirty means it was his intention to cause harm. I certainly wouldnt say it was a clean hit. If you want to quantify it I would say it was a bad hit.

Thats been happening to me also.

Yes it was a very bad in game decision. Just like blocking in the back etc which we had a few of during this game that caused some pretty good returns to be called back. Its a lack of discipline and they need focus on the fact that if you cant get your head in front of the defender you HAVE to let it go. I hope the coaches get on top of this. I dont know who the player is but it might be because the player hasnt gotten enough game time reps. That fact also leads to undisciplined play. I am not making excuses. He made a bad decision. But I dont think his intent was to hurt the player.

"""Hey Darell, I loled because I knew your kind would accuse malicious intent, not that the kid broke his leg. """

So whats the matter with that quote?

LOL LOL

What kind of a question is that considering we dont offer those sports. I realize he is trying to walk it to a preconceived conclusion as if its some type of moral equivalency. Fact is he answered a question with a question. Kind of disingenuous dont you think?

I hope he has a speedy recovery.

Wrong. I am sure you can understand that I cant say where the information came from considering the ongoing relationship between the company and the vendor.

I didnt see it on TV. Was the fracture an arm or leg? Glad it wasnt a neck injury.

You didnt answer the question. Are all of your sports funded to the max allowed by the NCAA? A simple yes or no will suffice.

At the time the scholarship rules were different than they are today. NDSU was what they used to call --over funded. After a time the under-funded schools got together and pushed through and voted on scholarship limits of 36 I believe.(could be wrong on that) I have never understood that excuse either because everyone had the same numbers. But after talking to former players from around that time the program faltered from a supposed lack of leadership and internal administrative turmoil behind the scenes.

You may chose to believe what you want.

Any information on Arnells injury? Hope its not serious.

You forget about your own presidents house over runs and issues.????? I never said that holding off is a bad thing. I brought up the subject that projects were being put off because of funding issues. Was basically called a liar. But dont know if your last sentence was an admission to the fact of the issues or not in you attempt at a backhanded comment.