bison73

Wow. Just wow.

Sic? You should know better by now that I don't judge and entire fans base off of your or SVs behavior.

Its always a converstaion within a select group. But drooling? seriously over stated.

We were not in the sunblauh conversation. Whats so hard to understand?

Plenty??? One of those two is is an FBS whore and lakes fan. You think that counts as plenty? LOL

Youre a liar plain and simple. Nobody was upset that CCU moved up. We weren't even in that conversation and didn't want to be.

Problem with that reading comprehension again I see. Seriously---I could care less about CCU and or that they may be moving up. If the school thinks that's whats best for their program I say good luck to them.

At the time of my post it hadn't .

I don't think is a running back problem. The o-line got their asses handed to them today. So did the d-line as well. They didn't control the line of scrimmage. This team has a lot of work to do. I wont even mention the d-secondary except for atrocious. The O-Coordinator also made some terrible calls at the end. MT basically gave us the game when they kicked the FG. We get the ball back with what? 2:50 on the clock? First play we run and get 5 I think. Then he goes to the air? Really? Plus rolling out CW when he was injured. In stead of making MT use up their TOs we stop the clock by going to the air. I guess my thoughts on basic strategy has been wrong all these years. WOW.

MY op---- Who cares? You don't think the compliance office hasn't consulted the NCAA on this? Plus we are offering EVERONE FCOA. When you do that there are no title 9 issues. We are in compliance Your response. "You've been told umpteen times that the NCAA does not determine Title IX, but the feds do. Dumb azz bizons." Now your above post says the NCAA has wording? Would that be the compliance I was referring to? Who do you think schools call in regards to title 9 to make sure they are in compliance? The feds? IMO the feds only get involved if there is a question of anyone has broken that law. No where in any of my posts have I said that the NCAA sues now did I. No. But to make sure I have an email sent to the NDSU compliance officer for clarification. I will post their reply regardless of the information sent.

Great game. They out played us.

Again---do you not think the NCAA has a compliance officer in regards to title IX?

You seriously don't think the NCAA has a compliance officer in this regard? Wow. The Feds made the law. They don't administrate it.

You seriously think that is cost cutting? I think it had more to do with the fact that last week they had fan day in which they gave away something like 1500 + of them. Geez. The event was sponsored by Scheels. But they also ran out of food which showed they were going on past numbers and didn't plan for a bigger turnout.

And what does your post have to do with FCOA?

Who cares? You don't think the compliance office hasn't consulted the NCAA on this? Plus we are offering EVERONE FCOA. When you do that there are no title 9 issues. We are in compliance

We are now at the MAX that the NCAA allows for both mens and womens sports.. You cant add where there are no more spots.

5.00 x 15,000 tickets = 75,000.00 x 6 games = 450,000.00 + 350,000.00 matching funds = $800,000.00. Which doesn't include other funding options. You do realize that they have a commitment for 1 million dollars over 3 years?

It depends on the scholarship the played receives. If he on a full ride he gets full cost. If hes on a half ride he gets half. At least that's what I have taken from it.

Yes you are correct. I misunderstood him.

The thing is the conferences cant stop schools from giving FCOA according to the NCAA directive. "" And why can't there be a conference mandate to tell members to, say, not implement FCOA for its football programs? "Our league, like many other conferences, has been advised by legal counsel against colluding as an organization, prohibiting our members from following approved NCAA legislation," he said. "The decision whether or not to follow NCAA autonomous legislation is completely up to each Division I institution." This puts FCS conferences in a pickle. Though it's "permissive" on the per-school level, it's not being something optional at the conference level for consideration. Since the legislation is considered official NCAA legislation - permissive or not - attempting to prohibit a group's members from enacting "permissive" legislation appears something that FCS commissioners are not eager to challenge legally. In other words, conferences are saying - schools, we can't stop you if we want to institute full cost of attendance.""

You are correct. The good thing is is they have a commitment for a million bucks to make this happen. Plus we have now added scholarships to the NCAA max for the rest of our sports.

May be you didn't hear that coa will be fully funded for the first 3 years due to a couple of big donars.

Why cant these coward just kill themselves? Why do they take somebody with them.