SIOUXFAN97

you do wonder when the next shoe is gonna drop which starts this all over again...you know big 10 is gonna target north carolina and maybe kansas which means the acc would have to add and then the big 12 would have to add someone too and it starts again...i don't think the mwc is as stable as most people think bc i think boise state is still wanting bigger and better things than the mwc (which is why peterson probably left for uw finally)....i just know that montana, montana state, idaho, and north dakota are a nice start to maybe something bigger and better down the line?

dont' know where this norseman, norsemen, norse ladies comes from.......FIGHTING NORSE!!!!

yes it would

hanson----black hills state

i disagree with everyone saying not a lot of talent at the skill position...i just think that a fb team starts with the o line and d line and they just need to get bigger and stronger and hopefully the coaches can hide some the deficiencies on both lines through creative coaching and yes i bet there two or three teams in the bsc that are better than this team and we happen to play all three of them!!

the one coach i was really wanting to see coach was rudolph and i'm not sure what to think especially the qb sneak...pecosky or iverson running it with adler in motion and clearing out the left side of the line would have been nice to see or if your gonna do qb sneak walk up and quck snap and damit joe move your feet your six two and two hundred plus!!!!...plus i am a huge proponent of the te being a big part of a balanced offense and tonight not so much other than the ruhe's nice catch and run....

im a game like this you would think that little dumps to your te or bootlegs to the te blocking then releasing would help joe a little...but yes that 50 yards was more than the last two years combined probablyl...

i guess ruldolph has never heard of a tight end too

i saw enought of little running backs getting two yards a rush the last couple of years....simmons/sharp/shaugs

wish they would roll mollberg out a little...drag routes to the te across the middle...more qb draws...bootlegs...use joe's feet a little more

let's see how this second half goes...i think jer saw his last carry in this game....maybe a little trickery or play action hit em long....bring some different blitzes...who knows what will happen in the second half but curious as hell to find out

if we outscore them 28 to 7 in the second half my prediction is dead on....this is where bubba and schmidt will make some adjustments and i think the second half should be fun to watch..

at least needs to knock it down!

31-28 sioux

it really does say a lot for what bubba thinks or thought of what muss had put together if six or nine true freshman or more are ready to play than some guys that have been in the program for one, two, three, four, or five years?

i thought maybe tt, fsu, and sdsu might be blowouts yet the only fbs game taht wasn't close was idaho??? who knows what the result will be but if we have the ball down a td with two minutes to go and we punt i will blow up my tv.

i got banned from there last year and i thought i was being tame so make it count while you can gfhockey

little worried about the right side of the o line...henson and meehan...what should we expect from them especially henson?

this game isn't and wasn't about money...if the ndac's number one program (fb) loses to und's number two sport the fans of the ndac won't know what to do...ten years ago they had an option adn that was to go d1...now when the ndac loses to und in fb what's left to do??? the only way that question wouldn't have to be answered was if the game was never played ever and the teammakers/gt/lakes were trying to make sure this game never happened.

the reason why the bar kept moving on these games being played was that the ndac/gt/teammakers did not want this game at any price at any venue ever? yet something changed and by the demeanor of the ndac officials at the press conference it seems like it was out of their hands...like they know something but can't tell the fans of the ndac?? something doesn't add up here?

for a team not wanting into the bsc (ndac) they sure are scheduling a lot of bsc teams?

call me a conspiracy lover but why do i get the feeling that fullerton is behind some of the ndac's recent ooc scheduling? ndac now has montana and weber this year...und, montana, and weber the next....ew the next couple of years and then und one more time for their ooc schedule....maybe the demeanor at the press conference was because fullerton told the new the ad at the ndac that this divide between the ndac and und needed to be closed before the ndac would be considered for future membership in the Big Sky Conference???

when do you think bubba names the starters and sets the depth chart?

any new news on the depth chart for the o-line... anderson barton boas ?? meehan

i would absolutely laugh if both usd and the ndac were left floating in fcs/d2/ncc 2.4 and sdsu with their new facilities is chosen by the big sky presidents as und's travel partner in a big sky/wac/fbs merger...usd is dead to fullerton and i can see the new ad at the ndac already buttering up with these odd ooc games he is scheduling...