Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

stoneySIOUX

Members
  • Posts

    8,062
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    67

Everything posted by stoneySIOUX

  1. You're right, they should just pack it in and not try and play their best players and win games in hopes someone else will prove they can be in the line up in 23-24.
  2. I get your point is that we should be playing the young guys. However, when the young guys have played, they haven't really performed. The others bring other things besides points, as well. When all things are equal, you play the one with the intangibles.
  3. I don't think the team feels that way and regardless if it's right or wrong, I just don't understand the logic sitting players who have spent their careers here.
  4. You're right. You win, Ox. Goodness. Round and round and round. We get it. You think the old guys suck and you'd make better coaching decisions than Bubs.
  5. So, putting out players who haven't performed when they are given opportunities is somehow supposed to make the team better? Yeah, ok.
  6. When does the onus go on the player? James has had his chance at Top 6 minutes several times this year. We all agree he's close, but he's never taken the step. Costantini absolutely had his shot at Top 6. He was on the power play to start the year! 28, 27, 10, and 19 all have carved out a role on this team and do not deserve to sit.
  7. Sounds like a plan to me. Just time to get out.
  8. I mean, we're already in a hole hahaha. But, if we don't sweep, we're definitely buried.
  9. I don't understand this lol. Why do you believe 29 deserves to play over anyone? Also, I have a fan club? Sweet! Do we get sweet pins or t-shirts or something? LOL
  10. Give them to him? Sorry, but he was invisible on Friday against UMD. He needs to work his way in, IMO.
  11. You were responding directly to a post about a tweet. Wouldn't a really great GPA normally be something to celebrate or is that only when we're having a great season?
  12. That's what you took from that? C'mon, man.
  13. All exactly how I feel.
  14. I think there's a chance becaus of that talent, but it's definitely not great. Never know! Could be a helluva ride. We've all been waiting for the year we backdoor ourselves into a national title. Chip and a chair
  15. I think we have enough to get there, but we gotta win lol. Four against two Top 5 PWR teams (Clown, DU), a team outside of the tourney, but ahead of us (Omaha) and four must wins (CC, Miami). I think just looking at how tight the PWR is right now, if we some how pull off 3 of 4 against DU and Clown, sweep Omaha and sweep the other two, it'd give us enough to jump.
  16. Started both games lol
  17. Close. I said three really great seasons and one incredible. I consider winning three conference titles really great. Some may not.
  18. I think this was the team's intention from the drop, but frankly, DeRidder just didn't play well enough. He's clearly got the talent to be a solid tendy in NCAA. Just gotta get it done. I absolutely think he should and will get the first opportunity and let's let him ride!
  19. I mean, I guess they could, but like I said before, this is our first poor season since 18-19 and we're on the heels of three really great (one incredibly great) seasons and we have a really strong pipeline of recruits.
  20. Not ok, but if you replace those three schools with teams like Quinnipiac, Providence, UMass, I think we're getting closer.
  21. Goodness, thank you.
  22. LOL gross. Go on and talk more about the Nodak jersey, I guess lol
  23. Untouchable is a bit heavy, but in my opinion, yes. Not sure I'd agree with the comparison with the goalies, however. Not sure how those two equate.
  24. I just don't think 10, 19, or 28 should sit for someone else. They bring various levels of skill, but all three play defense and have other intangibles that I think have to be had on the ice. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...