Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

stoneySIOUX

Members
  • Posts

    8,177
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    68

Everything posted by stoneySIOUX

  1. Exactly! He's changing the name and absolutely running away.
  2. That's a pretty large majority of the fanbase that will be letting it sink in. Progress won't stop. Not saying it will. I just don't think it's fair to leave any of this to a new president.
  3. Have your opinion and I'll have mine. It's too soon. I don't know what's appropriate, but evidently you do. Relax. It's ok to have dissenting opinions. All I know is that a couple of months is too soon. At least give it a year/sports year to let it sink in a little bit.
  4. And I don't think he should have to clean up the scraps just because Kelley inherited a mess. Finish the clean up. Regardless if he can or can't, he shouldn't have to. It's not the new President's responsibility. Kelley signed on to the mess knowing it was coming.
  5. He's starting with the new nickname being BRAND NEW. At least give it a year... or an athletic season.
  6. Not disagreeing with either of you and I definitely think it's time to go, but I think it's BS that he's leaving the new president residual nickname garbage.
  7. I disagree. Average age of college presidents is in the 60s. I'm sure it has nothing to do with this, right jdub? Dude is running and it's BS.
  8. I don't have enough on my W2... I know there are a couple people to ask around here though
  9. He's still running away from it while a new name will be ripe. It will be a brand new name for a brand new President and I think that's wrong.
  10. So cowardly. Run and hide while the name transition is just starting. Good riddance.
  11. Sounds like Mr. Eichel is learning how to deal with the media very early on in his budding hockey career. I'd like to hear how this question was framed. I just don't see him staying.
  12. I would be absolutely STUNNED .... And frankly, terrified ... If he doesn't sign with Buffalo immediately after the draft.
  13. Me too. Anyone else? Say I.
  14. I am just floored that this garbage discussion came about from that fantastic article.
  15. AGAIN.... Bueller.... anyone? Just stop with this nonsense! We've totally ripped a really excellent article about an excellent coach. MOVE. ON. UGGHHHH
  16. Good lord. What a joke. This writer pens a fantastic article about Hak and his legacy here and the CONTINUING legacy of UND and some are still ripping him? Why? It's so dumb. He's not coaching here this year. Move on. Cripes.
  17. They were an eight seed that year. You're falling all over yourself with your arguments. Again.... he's gone. Move on.
  18. Do you think Hak got either? I certainly don't. And neither do the Flyers.
  19. He's gone. So is Gino. Move on. You're arguing over something that literally means nothing.
  20. Jees! http://www.inforum.com/news/3759559-police-responding-armed-robbery-downtown-fargo-witness-reports-hearing-shots-fired
  21. I feel like CS generally has a good grasp on this stuff. So, 28 it is. Regardless, I guess I don't see him staying here more than two years. I'd love to see it.
  22. Every draft board I've seen has him in the Top 10. So be it if I'm wrong, I'm just going off what I've seen.
  23. I'd say it's fair to say two years for a potential Top 10 pick wouldn't be terrible. I wouldn't be surprised to see all of our guys come back next year. They all seem to have a good head on their shoulders and love the program. Dunc had a bunch of FA offers from the NHL after his Hobey year and stayed four. I feel the same will happen with Stecher, Thompson, Pooly, Gage... LaDue could very well go. He's just really, really, really good.
×
×
  • Create New...