jdub27

I feel confident that it is accurate because your response shows you don't understand it. Also, I'd ask for examples on what is wrong with it but looking at your track record, I know you will either change the question or use some straw man argument and avoid it.

They didn't want uninformed people spewing misleading information. I'd also like to join in the those asking you for what lies are in that ad.

I thought this article on Ole Miss's recruiting is a little bit relevant and gives some insight to the strategy Mussman is using, though at a much smaller level.

From the Herald article: I take it they haven't read the settlement agreement. No one is happy about it (minus a few vocal NDSU fans) but it is unfortunately the truth.

Sanctions or changing the name : Changing the name is the lesser of those two evils if you truly support the University of North Dakota.

LOUD NOISES!

Really? Because here was your original argument... It seems to me that your point was that even if UND drops their athletics, they could still be like some of the finest colleges in the country. Yet you can't provide one. This isn't semantics, it is you being called out on a blatantly false statement. You say it is all about being one of the finest schools even without sports, yet you can't provide any of these schools. Who are some of these finest colleges in the country that don't have sports that you refer to that UND should aspire to be like?

Same spin that was quoted as truth by NDSU fans when the VB and MBB games were scheduled. NDSU has proven themselves no more then EWU (a team NDSU fans love to rag on) has the last couple years. A playoff appearance followed by a national championship. NDSU has a couple more years before you start declaring yourselves as a Montana or Georgia Southern. As was shown this year by NDSU (successful) and UNI (unsucessful) scheduling, it is becoming a lot harder to get those two home counter games without signing a home and home and teams will keep holding out for big time money because they know they can. And we are talking about games 3 and 5 years out. If you don't think they field will be close to level by then, you don't remember history all that well.

^^^^^^^ Speaking of lashing out when you're proven wrong ^^^^^^^ Dave, you still haven't listed those top schools that without athletics that UND could be like by dropping their athletic program. Remember, the ones that you claim exist but yet you still haven't been able to name.

This is always conveniently excluded when UND is blamed for stopping the rivalry (in football). Does anyone actually think that UND would still be on NDSU's schedule today if UND wouldn't have cancelled the games? Was NDSU really going to keep UND on their schedule when UND wasn't a counter or NDSU got into a conference and only needed a couple of OOC games to fill out their schedule? The games where going to stop regardless. It made sense for UND to cancel it when they did due to D-II playoff rules (that were changed within a year or two). Could they have renewed it after the changes? Yes. But how long until NDSU cancelled it after that, maybe another year or two?

With what? Logic and rational thoughts?

Absolutely incorrect. The NCAA is abiding by the settlement that they signed with UND and the State of North Dakota. They have no reason to change their position from what was spelled out in the settlement. And knowing when to cut your losses is not giving up, it is being rational and reasonable, something that is missing from a handful of posters around here.

As has been explained many times, when NDSU joins the rest of the sports world by figuring out dynamic pricing, it may not bring more fans but will absolutely raise more revenue which helps soften the blow of the possible loss of an FBS game. You can't tell me that there people would refuse to go because ticket prices are an extra $10 for that game (minimum), which would raise an extra $150,000 without doing a thing (19,000 tickets less 4,000 student tickets). NDSU runs the same risk by brining in cream puffs to start their season. While not a rivalry game, anything can happen. But then again you also state that UND/NDSU was a rival game but hasn't been one in quite a few years, so I guess you cancelled your own argument on that. I can never figure out the logic of NDSU fans. On one hand, they claim they are light years ahead of UND and the game wouldn't be close (much like the cream puffs NDSU brings in to start each season). On the other hand they say that anything can happen and there is just that tiny possibility they could lose (which I don't hear about the cream puffs NDSU brings in).

. Not when one of those good goalies name was Mike Lee.

Coming from the fan of a team who's fanbase has to educate people on how to properly pronounce their nickname...

You are full of it. Otherwise you would have been demanding that men's and women's hockey team wear their normal jerseys during the postseason because it would have made a point. But you didn't. Pretty easy to sit on the sideline and spout off nonsense. I will have to agree with you on your first point though. This is bigger than UND sports but not for the reason you think. It is bigger than UND sports because it is about the University of North Dakota as a whole being the most successful university it can be and not be hampered by sanctions and bad PR.

Kind of an understatement considering you had players starting chants during the championship celebration.

Looks like he's transferring to be close to home due to his father being ill. Played JUCO out of high school and his sophomore eligible year at Texas Tech. I'm somewhat confused as this this article says he was at the JUCO two years but was hurt one of them and took a redshirt. So does he have another redshirt available (first one could be reclassified as medical?) or will he lose one of the two eligible years he has left because I assume he has to sit out a year. Some info on him coming out of JUCO and headed to Texas Tech. Lots of positives though his FT% looks like it may fight in and its not a good thing.

Someone is listening: Vote Yes

It seems like you are starting to see the writing on the wall and have now gone into full blown denial mode which is including ranting and ravings that are more nonsensical than normal. And after a few years the vast majority will say "Sure glad we don't have to deal with that nickname fiasco anymore."

I was thinking a tinfoil hat, but that would work as well.

That is about all they would be able to get out because they would be laughing once they realized you were being serious.

Don't expect a response (or at least one that has anything to do with the question you asked).

Video of the debate A couple highlights (paraphrased) Strand: We had an agreement, we should stick to it Carlson: The Sioux people weren't at the table for it <--He must have missed were that argument got tossed out in court. Strand: There is concern about hurting the University Carlson: Well I think that is an argument for the side to movingonasfastasicanchangethesubject... I wish Strand would have went into a little more detail but there wasn't much time for that.

If this opinion piece is any indication, he's going to use actual facts to make his argument and that should make him a heavy favorite. Unless of course Carlson just keeps repeating "It's the law, it's the law..."