MafiaMan

Team's in Anaheim so the point is moot.

Breaking news: United Center to be imploded at 9:00 am tomorrow morning.

Great work. I forgot that one. Bag skate tonight at the Honda Center too.

Down 0-1? Fire Coach Q, trade Kane and Sharp, and find a new goalie to replace Crawford. Did I miss anything?

My preference of teams that are left: 1. Tampa Bay Lightning 2. New York Rangers 3. Los Angeles Mighty Ducks of Anaheim 4. 2010 Canada Olympic Team 5. 1980 Soviet Olympic Team 6. Chicago Blackhawks

Grimaldi's head snaps back after the stick to the cage. In that split-second, he loses sight of Holl, then looks the wrong way in trying to find him, just as Holl finds the puck on his stick. .6 is a myth!

-1

The bad news: Impossible to catch Ray77 and The Sicatoka. The good news: I won't finish in last place!

I think it's hypocritical to think of yourself (not you personally) as a "good" fan, yet yell that kind of drivel at a football or basketball game against any opponent, not just UND.

It might be a bit hypocritical to continue yelling "Sioux suck" or "Sioux suck sh*t" to make fun of UND's old nickname too. I guarantee that that will go on for years though.

And another Capitals playoff collapse is complete.

gfhockey...

New York might wanna cover that guy when he breaks to the net...

F: Stamkos TB F: Nash NY F: Ovechkin WAS D: Niskanen WAS I'll be down to just Stamkos and Nash if the NYR win tonight and Stamkos, Ovechkin, and Niskanen if the Capitals pull off the upset.

Well, the way he played tonight, perhaps they'll trade for Tampa Bay's Brent Bishop? Good catch.

They'll be after Adam Wilcox.

Sprouted up a few inches since I was last over at your place or are you wearing your Gene Simmons platform boots again?

Figured McIntyre was gone once I read that Boston's back-up goalie signed a deal with the KHL...bummer.

And how many regionals (under the current system) have BC, Minnesota, Michigan, etc. hosted since 2002-2003 anyways?

Fixed your post.

Seems like everyone wants to think that a move to on-campus sites would benefit only the "big" schools but that's not the case at all. Problem is, they're all fixated at how Yale a couple of years ago and Providence this season have a better chance at "neutral" venues (and I use that term loosely with respect to the Friars this year).

I am dumbfounded that more coaches aren't in favor of the plan.

Why does the on-campus vs regional sites topic come up every spring and then the coaches vote and it's shot down 50-6?