Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

WPoS

Members
  • Posts

    1,177
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WPoS

  1. yah, but I am sure people would pay to get articles from the Onion if they had to...that is about as much as I trust this place if they get it that wrong WPoS
  2. Sorry buddy, the USHR article has been pretty much debunked a a bunch of hack drivel..... WPoS
  3. actually that "article" was pulled from another web site (USHR) and was credited with the info. <snip> On another note, is was also reported that #23 was on the ice practicing today... WPoS
  4. yah, right now the Gophs DON'T live up to the seed, but at the bginning of the year they did, and then some. It just happens that it all evens out that the last half they played slightly above .500 and the stats still had us in the 4th slot. In all reality, I don't think there will EVER be a way to pick the seeds that will make everyone happy and be 100% "fair". BTW, wanna bet the letter writer WASN'T a Gopher fan? WPoS
  5. you could, it all depends on WHO you play and IF you win! WPoS
  6. Ok, as long as none of them are green! BTW, many Gopher fans I know have been hoping to see Harrington benched for a while now... WPoS
  7. Actually we didn't play here last year. The locations are bid on in advance by all venues. As the previous post said, next year the Ralph will host a regional and not the Cities. So don't worry, it isn't all a vast Gopher/Boston conspiracy. Altho, money DOES play a role in the selected sites. And seeds also play a role in WHERE a team plays. Concievably this year the Gophs could have hosed themselves out of playing at Mecca and next year UND could get hosed out of playing at the Ralph. It all comes down to consistancy/seeds. Genarelly there is a group of teams that make the field of 16 very consistantly and it seems like they get special treatment, but ithey do not. WPoS
  8. No, normally it is everyone else whinning that the refs rule in FAVOR of the Gophers....in fact, I have stated that the reffing was horrible all around, inconsistant and poor for ALL teams playing. All the WCHA boys will get rude awakenings when they get non-WCHA refs in teh NCAA's... WPoS
  9. I played with the bonus and such on USCHO lots and pretty much had the Gophs locked into the fourth #1 easily...is it perfect? Is it always fair? But it IS better than what we used to have and hopefully they can keep improving the methodology as time goes on. WPoS
  10. Sorry about that...hung for a while but the peer pressure got to me and I had to go with some of the peeps I was going out with after the game... WPoS
  11. correct, the SS.com coach tried to rally her troops to pull a win out after leading and then losing the lead. Great tending by the SS.com goalie! I will have a traveling trophey made for next year to go the winning team. WPoS
  12. WPoS

    UND vs. Gophs

    you guys won, fair and square. For the record, you guys had too many men on the ice a bunch of times, because Harrington counts as a player for our opponents! WPoS
  13. WPoS

    UND vs. Gophs

    WOW, First goon and I are in agreement, and now I find myself supporting a comment by sprig! What is the world coming to? ONE. OF. THE. MOST. BIZZARE. THINGS. I. HAVE. EVER. SEEN. WPoS
  14. hey, CC is one heck of a team, we couldn't find the back of the net to save out lives....CC is a good team. Definitly a FF team. WPoS
  15. WPoS

    Robbie Bina

    yes. ditto all that! WPoS
  16. WPoS

    UND vs. Gophs

    true, best wishes to the player! I didn't get to see anyhitng I was trying to find Mafia Man, so I missed it all.... I look forward to a good tilt tomorrow... WPoS
  17. as many wanted: a showdown! Cry havok, and let loose the dogs of war! WPoS
×
×
  • Create New...