siouxforeverbaby

yes, they may have wanted to sign him. But we were not in his discussions with them, so we can't rule out that he said, i don't feel like i am mature enough to move on and they replied with then, stay and we will wait until you are ready. My point was, we were not party to his discussions with anyone...so, we can not state that is what happened in those conversations.

can't really read much into that, he could just want to visit there before making a decision.

I am sure that they have talked as well, but that doesn't mean that he told him to stay because he was in the AHL this year. The chances of that happening whether you stay for 1,2,3,4, or even 5 years are great....I am pretty sure that the guys all know that. For all we know, Danny is staying not because of conversations that he had with other players but because of conversations that he had with the Canadiens.

In regards to number 2, Frattin played 56 games in the NHL and 26 in the AHL during the season. He had 15 pts with the Leafs and 18 with the Marlies. That is of course, assuming that hockeydb is correct. They may have talked...but I don't know if Fratts being with the Marlies had much to do with it. He played 15:59 minutes for the Leafs in their final game of the season, he went back to the Marlies after the Leafs were done.

Sorry for taking so long to reply, but....I know what happens if I vote either way....what I am debating is how I can vote without using just my emotions.

I would agree that it is probably too close to call. One thing that concerns me though is not everyone is going to understand it with the change in wording and will just pick one.....which means that the ending will not be a true vote of the people. I haven't actually decided which way I am going to go on this because I am torn about what to do. d1siouxfan, I would be careful about generalizations such as "most of the fans and alumni". Unless you go out and ask every single fan and every single alumni that question, you have no way of knowing for sure. Unless you use sampling or another method....and that is still a generalization.

I think it would depend on the University. Colgate is preferring that one of their Women's Assistant Coach has a Masters and one has a 4 year degree. Mankato and Vermont are requiring 4 year degrees for their Head Coach positions. St. Lawrence is requiring a 4 year, but preferring a masters for their assistant coach. I found this info on the NCAA Market's website.

CRAP! I am sorry, you are right! Way to pay attention to me! Congrats siouxknocka...you are right...you did win! You are welcome too, guys! I enjoy doing it.

Since nobody won, I will try to remember to start this round up again next fall. You will have to make new picks though....but I would wait until next fall.

And that is the final score.

14 to go.....I hate to say this, but Good Job to the Gophers. Patterson was good this weekend

Under 40 to go

Gleason. 5-2 Edit: They give it to Mario

Gopher Goal, 5-1 with around 5 minutes left

5:28 to go

PP over, about 8 minutes to play in the game

Hooking on the Gophers, UND going back on the PP

Knight to the box, UMN PP

You don't get it, do you? Hak can plan for the game all he wants. He can not force the other team to not score. I realize that you can't have an excuse every year. Last year, we messed up. Everyone knows that and admits that. This year, we do have a legit excuse. But, I am done now. I am not going to argue with someone who is not going to listen to both sides.

Start of the 3rd period. And UND is going on the PP

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, FORGIVE US FOR NOT WANTING TO GIVE UP ON OUR TEAM. FORGIVE US FOR REALIZING THAT WITH ALL OF THE INJURIES AND ALL OF THE SCORING THAT WE LOST FROM LAST YEAR, THIS TEAM WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE HERE...LET ALONE BE A NUMBER ONE SEED!!!!! You can be negative, you can disagree with us, but DO NOT call us names for cheering for our team.

End of 2 and its 4-1 Goofs.

KRISTO!!!!! 2-1

UMN 2 - UND -0

Start of the second. UMN - 8, UND - 9 from the first