Redneksioux
-
Posts
2,977 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Posts posted by Redneksioux
-
-
2 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said:
Did the police know he'd just shot 3 people? I'd say no, judging by how they told him to get the F out of the road as they were approaching the scene.
Should the police have listened to him as he was trying to confess and turn himself in? Yes. They let their emotions and the stress of the situation cloud their vision and hearing.
They should have known, with the number of people that witnessed and were yelling he shot people. Dispatch also should have had a description that would have gotten to the police almost immediately.
Sides were clearly picked by law enforcement ahead of time based on video that’s been posted with officers thanking the militia and handing out waters to them.
-
23 minutes ago, Sioux>Bison said:
The governor failed to have enough protection for the city and it subsequently got looted and burned. When citizens feel the government isn’t going to protect them they will take up arms and protect themselves! When you leave a void like that this is what is going to happen. You act like fleeing back to Illinois is a big deal! He probably went home 15 min away from Kenosha!
I’ll admit, this is the first time I’ve ever witnessed (on video) someone shoot multiple people and be allowed to walk right by police still carrying the AR.
I don’t care how far from Illinois he is. Point is he was allowed to walk away openly carrying his weapon, right by the police, no questions asked.
If he was black you really think he’d still be alive? -
3 minutes ago, Bison06 said:
Except the elected officials in Minneapolis I guess.
i said reasonable folks;)
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, Sioux>Bison said:
And the liberals blame white nationalists for sparking this looting........ I couldn’t see any of them in the videos though........
thank you liberals for letting Trump back in the election! This anarchy will help Trump win 4 more years!
You realize that all of this is happening under Trump's watch right?
-
6 minutes ago, Sioux>Bison said:
The police have their hands full. This should be blamed on the Governor as he hasn’t called up enough state police or national guardsmen to quell this destruction. The only reason these vigilantes are on the streets protecting businesses is because the government failed to protect them! This is a failure of government that has ruined the lives of 3 people so far!
So the governor ordered the police to thank the armed vigilantes and get them refreshments? I bet he also instructed them to let this kid walk right by them toting his AR after he shot multiple people. How did he get back to Illinois?
-
5 minutes ago, homer said:
Ok.
Most of this started the night the police precinct was offered up as a symbol for “protestors” to burn down. You don’t put those actions back in the bag and suddenly make them wrong
Most reasonable folks, even democrats, don't agree with allowing protesters to burn any buildings, including police precincts.
-
4 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said:
Are the shots coming from him? He seems as surprised as anyone when he hears them and turns around.
Good catch, I can't tell from the video.
-
2 minutes ago, homer said:
The Democratic Convention didn’t try to help this. Their platform was “we hate Trump.” The group rioting wants everyone to think it stops if Biden is elected It’s a fear tactic to drum up votes for Biden Unfortunately for them it may drive for votes for Trump in places like Minneapolis, which will completely flip that state
The democrats are not rallying or supporting the rioters. Yet the republicans continue to fan the fire. So much to the point that there's people just waiting for their opportunity to riot and loot - a suicide triggered looting in Minneapolis last night.
-
1 minute ago, UNDBIZ said:
Where is he shooting indiscriminately into the crowd?
at 28 seconds
-
39 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said:
I thought I'd seen all the videos, but I've apparently missed this one. You got a link?
https://twitter.com/DemWrite/status/1298506383638200323?s=20
-
1 minute ago, TheFlop said:
People need to wait for more information to come out, something BLM and their supporters don't like to do because it is often detrimental to their case and they want to get their disruption/destruction in.
Absolutely the kid didn't have to be there after curfew.....but he had just as much right as all of the protestors there that were also breaking curfew. It is ironic that bringing a gun both helped create a bigger potential issue while also most likely saved his life.
I'll wait for more information to trickle out but the three people that were shot all have sh*tty records so don't rule out the fact that their actions that night helped contribute to a self defense situation. All of this could have been avoided if the Milwaukee mayor and Wisconsin governor had learned from the mistakes of Frey and Walz and immediately called in reinforcements/plenty of national guard. Instead they were too busy immediately throwing their officers under the bus (trendy these days) and blabbering apologies out.
So you disagree the reason he was targeted was the fact he was open carrying an AR through a protest? You think he still would have been attacked if he wasn't open carrying?
The police have every reason to be thrown under the bus after enabling these losers.
-
3 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said:
Jacob Black was given plenty of opportunities to not get shot. He's an idiot, it's too bad he's paralyzed now though.
Not disagreeing. But watching the opportunities Kyle Rittenhouse was granted by law enforcement will only spark further unrest.
-
2 hours ago, TheFlop said:
It will depend on whether any of the leaked videos are actually true or not, because if they are accurate good luck finding any jury that will nail him on 1st degree murder. Lesser charges are possible.
The immediate overreaction by the DA is 100% to pander to the rioters in the hopes it will stop them from rioting any more than they already are. Going down the same road as the Atlanta cop that was immediately fired and charged (that is going to be in line for a huge payday because of the complete overreaction there).
There's a strong chance the DA knows that a self defense argument is gonna keep this kid from getting in any real trouble anyways so at least by charging him out right away (instead of delaying it and using the appropriate charge) they are appeasing the BLM rioters.
Self defense. I can see that on one of his shots possibly. Still he had no right to be there past curfew and carrying an AR at a protest. Peppering bullets into the crowd is also not self defense. The video I saw showed no Molotov cocktail and there was also mention of a shot fired by him prior to the video, likely what caused the protestors to go after him.
it’s odd how he was able to walk up to and past a number of police carrying the AR, with his hands sometimes in the air. Jacob Blake wasn’t given an opportunity anywhere near this kid.
-
48 minutes ago, SWSiouxMN said:
So hi
not sure if anyone is aware.
but downtown MLPS isn't a good place right now.
Sad to see this happening and it only seems to be going downhill.
-
37 minutes ago, UNDlaw80 said:
Just another example of why no trust exists towards cops in inner cities.
EDIT: Apparently more than one militia group was at the protest. One of which (there to just protect property) became furious at police when told to 'help handle the protesters'. (2nd video clip)
Another perfect example of people not qualified to be handling firearms. Concerning to see the police picking a side here.
-
2 minutes ago, Kab said:
do you think some rancher farmer wouldn’t go after these so called peaceful protesters if they came thru his fence or road and started crap like they were doingthey would probably just shoot at them as look at them twice
maybe we need more old west justice
Based on what I'm reading here, protesters wouldn't last too long in rural North Dakota.
-
4 minutes ago, dmksioux said:
The "mob" was beating their chest to show power by marching in an area they had no business being in. The property owners were returning the favor, letting them know what would happen, should they turn their "peaceful protest" into looting/property damage. So it's ok for them to march on private property illegaly but it's not ok for someone to show they will defend that property, should the protest get out of line? Ok, got it.
Go ahead and show force, but do not point gun at someone/something you do not intend to shoot.
-
2 minutes ago, 1972 said:
the reason they had no intentions is because they HAD guns....simple concept
so now that their guns are gone, their mansion is burning?
-
6 minutes ago, MrEdway said:
You cheer cop killing...I cheer thug killing.
I do not cheer cop killing.
Are you a boogaloo boi?
-
51 minutes ago, dmksioux said:
Yes, I think it will play very well to Americans who are sick and tired of the looting and lawlessness being allowed in democratic run cities. Enough is enough and many Americans are beginning to help law enforcement defend their property and businesses. Many examples of this going on.
There's a big difference between defending your property and pointing guns at people that showed no intention of even stepping foot on your property.
-
12 minutes ago, MrEdway said:
About time. Worthless anti American thugs.
Great people on both sides here!
-
15 minutes ago, Frozen4sioux said:
Ok... ooooo you're so close, this is like watching a neaderthal discover fire..
Correct none of those bad things happened....
why.....
Try real hard I know it hurts but you're ALMOST there....
Good people with guns had the courage to stand up for their rights and property.
They MOST DEFINITELY had the intention of shooting ANY of the riot scum if they chose to continue those actions.
As would I and millions and millions other gun owners would,
and will......If necessary.
Guns worked as the detefent here.
I get it now, they saved the whole gated community from being burned. Hero's they are indeed:)
-
1 hour ago, Sioux>Bison said:
Missouri’s Castle law will overrule that law. This is why many have called for this frivolous lawsuit to be dismissed and the prosecutor disbarred!
right or wrong can be debated but the legally had a right to show force to protect their property.
We shall see.
-
7 minutes ago, Bison06 said:
So what's the problem then? The republicans are highlighting this incident as an example of law abiding citizens being persecuted on prosecuted for following the rules. (Rightfully so)
Why is it ok to take away someone's rights because you happen to disagree personally with their actions?
They broke no laws, but their names will forever be associated with this incident and trying to run a personal injury practice will be nearly impossible for them. I would sue the pants off of anyone I could if I was them too.
I’m all for defending and upholding the 2nd amendment as I’m sure you are as well.
You really think putting these two front and center is going to help that cause?
2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)
in Community
Posted
This isn’t a white privilege mystery. The police clearly had picked the militia’s side before the shootings occurred. This whole thing looks very bad for them.