I have to agree with DaveK's point that if this was the Sioux, and the no goal ruling was upheld, there would be a fair contingent of Sioux fans who would be screaming that the Sioux were robbed. I agree that the video was probably not conclusive to call it a goal, but if your team scored that goal I bet you would be able to find the shape of the puck as it's getting kicked out of the goal, and that shape is far enough back to be all the way in.
Conclusive? Not quite. But it's damn close and call me crazy I think it's interpreted by whether you wanted that goal to count or not. Not saying either side is right or wrong, just that's the way things usually break down. I bet if we read Michigan's board the majority of them would agree it was a good goal.
On a side note, DaveK admitted it wasn't conclusive in his first post. There were several posts with pretty harsh responses to his for some reason, and now people want to rip him for his arrogance? I don't think DaveK started this.....