I was thinking about this a bit and there's good points on all sides of this argument.
I do want to make one comment which is based on my perception so correct me if my facts are out of line.
When the REA was conceived the students had a larger portion of seats in the lower bowl. Then that was changed.
When the REA was opened students were required to quit standing (which apparently they had been doing at the old arena) full time.
Then a few more seats in the lower bowl were removed from the students to open up sight lines.
Then the students were told they had to clean up their cheering.
Then the signs were (too closely) monitored.
The ticket process is confusing and frustrating (at least this year).
Some of the things mentioned above are legit and proper and brought on by the students themselves. But in total, since the REA was opened, the student been put in the position of giving ground.
I ask a legit question from the outside because I'm not so familiar with all the details and goings-on: While all this has been going on have the students been given anything? Have they been made to feel wanted? Or has every step either been discipline, or at best a lesson in hard knocks?
If my perception is right, even though some of the difficulty has been brought on by the students themselves (clean up the vulgarity) it's not difficult to understand why the students would commonly feel "put upon".
Maybe all that is happening wouldn't feel like it hurts so much if UND/REA also took steps to make the students feel like they were an important and desirable part of the atmosphere.
Ok, point out where my flaws are....