I understand it all pretty simple. If UND and UNO are tied for first but UNO swept UND UNO should get first. Doesnt matter who has less losses one bit. You could tie every game doesnt make you any good. Even though you have no losses.
There is no flaw. If 2 teams are tied. It shouldnt matter who has less losses. It should matter who won more games against that other team. And if those two teams spliy it goes to goals scored.
If the season ended today UND would be the number one seed. They have the best win loss vs omaha. Split with Miami but wins in the goal differential.
It basically will never come down to a coin toss. Its how well you did against the top of the league (the other best teams). The "number of losses is already calculated with how many points a team gets. And could make an argument against shoot outs. I dont consider it a "flaw". Just a matter of opinion. Youd basically be arguing two ties are better than one win and one loss when basically it should be equal.