Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

The Sicatoka

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    36,572

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    575

 Content Type 

Everything posted by The Sicatoka

  1. The Sicatoka
    Every off-season it seems. KRACH is pure analytic. It's based off Bradley-Terry modeling methodology.
  2. The Sicatoka
    They "adjust" the weightings of WinPct, OppWinPct, and OppOppWinPct in RPI frequently; RPI is a key factor in PWR. They have "good road win" fudge factors that they've brought in to the RPI also. They used to use a "Last 16 games" comparison in PWR (besides RPI, ComOpp, and H2H).
  3. The Sicatoka
    NDSU is looking for a new "voice". Rob Hipp lasted one season. https://www.bison1660.com/2023/03/10/nationwide-search-beginning-for-ndsu-radio-play-by-play-voice/
  4. The Sicatoka
    Anyone know if we can borrow a former MN Governor's St. Paul street map? Seems the appropriate one to use on St. Pat's.
  5. The Sicatoka
    Thirty seconds of thought had UND/SCSU as the late game. Denver as the 1 seed gets longer rest (assuming they win) Relatively local teams' fans are more likely to attend a night game Relatively local teams will have the arena looking better on primetime TV
  6. The Sicatoka
    It's too objective and analytic. No knobs to twiddle like PWR and RPI, so no "twiddle the criteria" committees and you have to have twiddle committees.
  7. The Sicatoka
    It's March; no surrender is what to give and expect.
  8. The Sicatoka
    You wear green on St. Patrick's Day in St. Paul. Next question. If they had green buckets to match the green roads you'd set the black hats aside for a day! Anyone have green stick tape?
  9. The Sicatoka
    They've won the games on their schedule and it's good enough. If there's a problem with PWR it's that they have to tweek it annually for "good road win" and other nonsense, plus they can adjust the weighting factors. KRACH is a better, more truly objective criteria, that should be used instead of PWR. I don't always agree with CollegeHockeyNews.com but on this I do.
  10. The Sicatoka
    62 of 67 for 0.925.
  11. The Sicatoka
    DeRidder went 62 of 67, 0.925. That’s about what I predicted it would need to be to win in three.
  12. The Sicatoka
    Double-double!
  13. The Sicatoka
    On an NHL rink.
  14. The Sicatoka
    Please show a picture of Coach G.
  15. The Sicatoka
    That’s three for James on breaks over that glove in two weeks.
  16. The Sicatoka
    Like @Goon golfing in Park River?
  17. The Sicatoka
    Once you see it you can’t unsee it.
  18. The Sicatoka
    I’d like to see that replay. Something in that collision didn’t look right. Why would the guy who committed interference go down.
  19. The Sicatoka
    Only 9 and 17 seen responsible for offense. It’s a team game; everyone needs to chip in.
  20. The Sicatoka
    You are a master of understatement.
  21. The Sicatoka
    Wilbur getting icy …
  22. The Sicatoka
    No line up card yet?
  23. The Sicatoka
    Frisch
  24. The Sicatoka
    Someone tell the camera op to slow down.
  25. The Sicatoka
    Thank you for loitering. Please come again.
×
×
  • Create New...