cberkas Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Just now, 1972 said: That IS NOT interfering If the puck was in front of the pad I’d see it not count for pushing the goalie in the net Quote
nascar99 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Correct call, puck already past him when contact was made. Should make it the NHL rule where you get a PP if the opposing team's goaltender interference challenge fails Quote
cberkas Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Who ever said Andrew will score, you were correct 1 Quote
SiouxFanatic Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, Oldguy said: I keep expecting him to punch one in at some point. Why not today? Good call. 👍🏼 3 Quote
brianvf Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 20 minutes ago, fightingsioux4life said: Every time I want to get psyched about this team, they go into a funk. Keep getting psyched, this team is good. 2 2 Quote
cberkas Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Just now, nascar99 said: Correct call, puck already past him when contact was made. Should make it the NHL rule where you get a PP if the opposing team's goaltender interference challenge fails Should get a penalty if the challenge fails 2 Quote
cberkas Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Omaha can challenge, it will be a penalty if the lose it. How do you say they can’t but will get a penalty if they lose, smfh Quote
brianvf Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago That was a good goal either way...off his skate but certainly not a kicking motion. These are the types of goals the "lower" lines need to score with a few skill guys out. Keep it rolling boys! 2 Quote
nd jg Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Boy, with the crap they have let go, and call that 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.