SiouxBoys

I 100% agree but the way the rules are written right now, that hit is five and a game automatically. Should the St. Cloud player do a better job at protecting himself? Sure. Should Pinto be smarter there and not throw a hit at a guy 4 feet off the boards? Yes.

Who's picking a fight? I'm asking questions to the people who seem to think the NCHC is working against UND.

So you think that was a dive?

Typically doesn't feel good getting your feet swiped out from underneath you.

Which play in this game did st cloud embellish?

So is the fix still in?

Some of you are so biased it hurts.

No

Micheletti needs a muzzle

By a UND player, yes.

Someone wake me up when the game starts.

1-0 Miami

Batting the puck and having it deflect off of you are not the same thing.

Responded to the wrong comment. My bad.

Wrong.

The shaft. His stick was in the air. Very close to the crossbar.

Whether the stick was high or not is a legitimate argument, but you're right. Too close to tell, have to stick with on ice decision.

No. It's 100% serious.

The refs got the no goal call right. Puck hits adams stick, hits adams on the shoulder, deflects off the Miami player (not possession and control which is needed), and enter the goal. No goal is the correct call.

still a hook

Rocco had limited playing time as he wasn't performing well, then scored two goals in the gold medal game against Sweden.

Except he played in 6 games, not 5.

The team doesn't make the playoffs if they don't burn Skokna's shirt.

Who's shirt did they burn this year for minimal usage?