Does anyone think it matter that Hak didn't play on a winning team at UND? Did he win a championship at any level as a player? Does it matter to have a winner like Eades or not?
By NHL style does that mean no skill and creativity on the puck and a dump at all costs mentality? I'm no great hockey mind but I don't see the horses on UND to be a great cycle team. A few years ago we could both kill people with the cycle and skill. This year it looks the like players that aren't Cagjewels and Gemaldees and Johnson are scared of the puck. And when those scared players try and get creative it's the same move that never works every time.
Let's make one thing clear about player tweets. Are they going to tweet anything other than support for the departed coaches? Of course not, weather they are happy they're gone or not they realize that their tweets are always being watched.
They should be pissed at themselves. If they want to leave, the door will always be open. The only players that should stay are those who are committed to staying here and putting in the work to fix things.
I don't think people were anointing Bradley as much as some make it seem. Maybe a person here and there but I don't remember people thinking he was going to lead us to the promised land.
Kotelnicki wasn't the recruiting coordinator for the next group of seniors. That was Belmore. Kotelnicki's first group would be Jameer Jackson and company.
Just the QB play should make a huge difference. The Oline had the most to prove of any group which say a whole lot about how much they sucked this year. A good thing about getting new coaches is that the best players will play. Gone are the days of wishing for Sparks to get carries and Labat Edwards and Rich to get snaps.