UNDBIZ

You're attempting to rewrite history to associate something you don't like with evil. It was done to support low-population states, which, at the time, were also slave-holding states. It wasn't done due to slavery.

CNN and the left are also conflating the 2. They refuse to call the rioters what they are.

The electoral college and the Senate were created to give low population states better representation in the federal government. The 3/5 compromise was created to give slave-holding states better representation in the House (and the electoral college) and was created entirely due to slavery. The electoral college wasn't created because of slavery and should not be conflated with the 3/5 compromise. It was created because of population differentials. It did however benefit most the states that were also slave-holding states at the time.

Interesting tactic.

I'm not missing anything. I didn't say people shouldn't be upset about police killings. I'm trying to point out for you why something that only directly affects a tiny fraction of a percentage of people causes others to be upset when they hear about it.

I'd assume it's multiple people simply repeating the story that came out of Florida or wherever months ago. There are also multiple scams going on nationwide where they call to tell you you're positive or have been in close contact with a positive and they need your credit card to send you treatment or a test.

6'6" 280# OL out of Iowa.

What percentage are being shot by racist police?

That was a head-scratcher.

Disgusting.

We've scared the folks with cancer and diabetes into avoiding the hospitals, so there should be room. Just need to do some retrofitting.

Hence the last sentence of my prior post.

Obviously we don't know. But those who tested positive now are armed with the information that they shouldn't be partying or visiting grandma for a bit. Knowledge of being positive isn't a bad thing. Should the media be blowing it out of proportion when a bunch of asymptomatic or lightly symptomatic kids show up positive? No. The community is safer now that those kids are aware of it. Information isn't a bad thing. How those in power use or react to that information is where it gets muddy.

Did I say that?

A couple years old, but relevant for the current situation, IMO.

If you alert that positive individual and they don't visit grandma.

Elimination? No Limitation? Yes

What's the difference?

Or he's concerned because 86% of the asymptomatic carriers may be unknowingly spreading the virus to their friends, classmates, coworkers, customers, and professors. When I've talked to Wynne, he seemed very hopeful regarding containment of the spread and maintenance of in-person classes. He's a realist who knows there will be cases, but wants to limit and contain those cases. What the media and helicopter moms do with his words is another story though.

Agreed.

Attorneys can and will argue about anything as long as they're getting paid.

I'm not an attorney, but doesn't this pretty clearly give him an out in this situation?

I think you quoted the wrong post.

Did he even get a shot off? I don't think simply carrying, or even pointing a pistol merits attempted murder. Felon in possession of a firearm though.

Nothing good seems to happen after the sun goes down.