I'd also like to see us play SUU, SDSU, SHSU, UNH, Chatty, Fordham, citadel, Colgate, ccu, jsu, jmu, csu, mcneese, uni, Richmond, Duquesne, w&m, isu-red, and Dayton.
Meh, defender trying to get a strong running back down, don't really blame him. The ndsu "block" on Arnell was straight up dirty and has no place in the game.
Oh they did have one more good loss than us, against the paper tiger SUU. I guess that guy did know what he was doing. 0 wins against playoff or fbs teams, but that doesn't matter.
Committee made it fairly clear the quality of losses was more important than the quality of wins. WIU had better losses than us, and more of them, so obviously the committee couldn't turn them down.
Sdsu lost to 2 playoff teams and 1 playoff joke. PSU lost to one playoff team and 1 non playoff team. But losing to a non playoff team obviously doesn't make a team bad or unworthy of a top 3 seed.....
northern Colorado was the same as south Dakota this year, yet ndsu got a 3 seed..... Your north Texas slam is ridiculous, but you know that. PSU slaughtered them anyway though.
So they're well coached enough to not have let downs against bad teams, but not talented enough to beat good teams. Sounds like they're way better than a seeded PSU that beat 2 fbs teams who are both better than any win sdsu has.
Portland St had the right to be upset as well. If their name is EWU with the exact same resume, they're probably a top 3 seed. 2 wins over fbs, one against a very good team and one absolutely dominating. Their losses came against UND, a team with a similar resume to Montana, and weber st, a better team on paper than south Dakota.....
Eastern Illinois - 0 quality wins, 3 blowout losses Sam Houston st - 0 quality wins, 1 bad loss New Hampshire - 1 quality win, 2 bad losses Western Illinois - FIVE LOSSES UND - 2 quality wins, 2 bad losses