UNDBIZ

As enlightening and well thought out as always....

First off, great to get another commit. But how long can UND continue bringing in 4-5 DEs per year while largely ignoring the QB, RB, & NT positions? I'm getting concerned over the lack of weight returning on our DL. Will need a couple OL to switch sides or bring in a couple JUCOs.

Another DE. Had an offer from Indiana State.

Computer rankings work well after 30 games with lots of nonconference games to compare. Not so great for an 11 game season with minimal inter-conference play.

I'm not saying what should happen. I'm saying what will happen. Perception is still that mvfc is best because they have the one best team.

If Indiana state wins to get to 7-4 with a d2 win, they will absolutely be in ahead of UND. Decent chance 1 6-5 mvfc team gets in ahead of a 7-4 UND as well.

Our offense was good for 3 games this year too.

Doubt it would've mattered.

The contention that UND would be killed by the run of the mill mvfc team is unfounded. UND has only lost 1 game by more than 1 score this year, and that was against a top FBS team. Offense is bad, but the D limits points against.

What a mess.

Watch your language. - Moderators

I believe just the 1. And he was slow as a freshman. Lots to see from Maag yet. I think he could be a great one. Wanzek is already very solid. Great hands, routes, and blocking.

Injuries have slowed them

Wanzek has been a steal and Maag looks just as good as Golladay did as a freshman. UND needs to recruit a speedy guy to complement them though.

I don't think our receivers are "horrible." Agreed on Rudy being terrible.

Montana all over Idaho. Hopefully the committee remembers what we did to the griz if we manage to win next week.

They'll get at least 3. 6-5 if they have to.

Needed a timeout to come up with that.

Yep

Only thing more predictable than our offense is PSU successfully running their QB on 3rd down.

Good thing PSU is really bad.