Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

zonadub

Members
  • Posts

    2,040
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by zonadub

  1. Don't think USD and/or SDSU will give up their home court advantage in the Summit bb tournament. NDSU moving to a WAC FBS makes sense in that they would not want to be 'left behind' like UND was when the XDSUs went DI.

    Not sure UND is ready, but looks like the recent reductions may be a precursor.

    interesting times indeed.

  2. 4 hours ago, fightingsioux08 said:

    I'm fine with waiting 5 years to determine if the f'n hawks name is accepted or not.  I just wanted to have a discussion.  I can't believe so many people are against this name, I thought it was a great idea

    and I thought Roughriders was a great idea, but it the 43rd iteration of Hawks and the millionth use of a bird, but it is time to move on...

  3. 1 hour ago, fightingsioux08 said:

    I don't care what the herald wants as unds name, I was referencing the article because the mindset of our fans hasn't moved on from the sioux name, and I don't believe "time" will have our hockey fans convert to liking "hawks" as a name

     

    Please let me know if you think that would be a cool name and logo or not

    Tell that to all the people who voted for the Fighting Hawks name because they thought the logo would be that multicolored one from the junior team in Canada.

     

    also, a 'no' vote from me.

    image.jpeg

  4. 1 hour ago, geaux_sioux said:

    Will signs with the Falcons. Not my favorite team but they have a huge need at LB. Seems like a good situation for him. I hope he crushes it.

    Agreed!!!

    • Upvote 1
  5. 3 hours ago, Cratter said:

    No dice in the game, but I believe a Big Sky split has always been the "grand plan" one at FBS and one at FCS....so a divisional split only makes the likely hood more likely. 

    Considering that the Big Sky is a one bid conference to the dance, wouldn't a split be more important in basketball?

  6. 4 hours ago, UNDvince97-01 said:

    Of course you are......no surprise there.

    Your judging of me by my avatar is comical.  Yeah, I hope UND Football gets added to the B1G because of hockey. :silly:

    What? You mean NDSU is not getting invited to the Big 12 because of wrasslin'?  Blasphemy!

  7. 4 hours ago, UND-1 said:

    ---Here is the Big Sky state of our athletic department heading into the 2015-2016 season.

    Big Sky All Sports Final Rankings - 2015

    Overall Athletic Pts    Men's  Women's  Total

    Northern Arizona        66.5 73.5  140

    Sacramento State       51 78  129

    Montana                     49.66 60.5   110.16

    Montana State            51.66 56.5   108.16

    Eastern Washington    55 49   104

    Weber State                48.5 43.5   92

    Idaho State                 36.33 51.5   87.83

    Northern Colorado      26 50   76

    Portland State             20 55.5   75.5

    Southern Utah            34.5 34.5   69

    North Dakota              22.5 38.5   61

     

     

    That's just plain sad

  8. 27 minutes ago, dmksioux said:

    Investing in MBB has the potential to bring in much more money than Women's Hockey.  I know we can't cut women's hockey, but we can invest more in MBB and in turn, receive more in returns.  There are studies out there that show how much money school can make if they make the dance, and more if they can win a game or two.  Everything from increased enrollment, to advertising dollars.  MBB has alot of potential if you invest in it...

    Just ask Northern Iowa

    • Upvote 1
  9. 7 hours ago, darell1976 said:

    USD had the SL to help them, being a member already, UND has no desire to join unless travel expenses are the next to be on the chopping block which makes the SL attractive. It's not like UND couldn't be a football only member in the BSC like UC Davis and Cal Poly. 

    Except that UC Davis and Cal Poly were never full members. There may be resistance if UND wanted to leave football in the BSC and move the rest. idk. 

  10. 46 minutes ago, SWSiouxMN said:

    So is Idaho going to make an official decision by the "May 4th" deadline, or will it be more towards the summer when they make up their minds as to Big Sky or Indy?

    The Idaho prez contracted with a consultant to report on the pros and cons of Indy vs FCS. The recent nickname fiasco gives an insight into what that consultant will more than likely report. It appears that the UI administration wants to join the Big Sky in football too, but there is a significant alumni push to stay Independent for a couple years after the 2017 season. The consultant will more than likely endorse what Spear wants to do. SiouxVolley has a much better finger on the pulse of this. 

    To answer your question, it looks like May 4 is a soft target to be able to plan the 2018 conference schedule, but Idaho will be accommodated if they need more time. Again, SV probably can give you a better answer. 

  11. After thinking about this for the past couple of weeks, a light has lit... If the B1G offers UND while Faison is the AD, he will fight it with all the power he has. He was arguably the instigator of the conference forming in the first place, so UND will not leave the NCHC without a huge fight from Faison. The NCHC is his legacy, more than anything else he has done in his entire career.

  12. Hypothetical question...

    if UND were offered and accepted a hockey affiliation in the B1G, would that cause the athletic department to start looking at trying to join the Summit and MVFC? Since the B1G schools are east, would that move the focus of conference affiliations for all sports east? I do not think it would have an impact on Big Sky membership for other sports, but I don't know s--t from shine-ola when it comes to the inner workings of the AD.

×
×
  • Create New...