stoneySIOUX

It's EXACTLY what they are doing... get the support from a group of people that are supporting their logos.... get twitter follows/mentions, facebook comments/shares, IG posts.... retweet, share, repost.... "HEY look at the potential new FH logo! These are sweet! I'd TOTALLY be on board if they looked like this!" .... exposure of brand.... $$$

No, they didn't. And it's not about any of us buying anything from them... it's about exposure. Every retweet/share/repost from a Sioux fan goes out to thousands of new people that can see their logos.

It's simple... get the support from a group of people that are supporting their logos.... get twitter follows/mentions, facebook comments/shares, IG posts.... retweet, share, repost.... "HEY look at the potential new FH logo! These are sweet! I'd TOTALLY be on board if they looked like this!" .... exposure of brand.... $$$ Well done, GLABS.

Great work. I really do like them both, but, you did it just for funsies? Looking for the cheap pop. Thanks for pandering to us. Bravo.

My guess.... they have PLENTY of ideas and stuff on paper, but we won't see many of them.

They started their own thread, btw. Tagged Sioux Forever, too.

Yeah, that was my question, too. So, doing this independently means what? UND already signed the contract with SME, right?

Dave Stafford called beats Jimmy Howard called by Doc Emrick. Minus the gaff, I'd love to hear this guy call Sioux games. Good stuff. Thanks Vegas!

Incredibly busy time of the year.

No, it does not mean that and I'm assuming that was a joke. Why this is maddening to me.... All of this talk is speaking in absolutes. - "Hockey only" fans don't support UND because they want to keep the Sioux name and don't yet buy into Hawks. - Supporters of Hawks are better fans than the Sioux holdouts - Hawks fans are betraying their Sioux history Can't we just agree to disagree and move on? The Sioux name is gone and is never coming back. FH is here to stay. HOWEVER, that DOES NOT MEAN that those who have yet to move on from the Sioux name won't eventually do so. For sake of this stupid thread, can we just allow people to figure it out for themselves? Who am I to judge someone who hasn't moved on yet from something that has been a part of them for a long time. And on the flip side, who am I to judge someone who has "moved on" and wears Hawks gear? 11 pages of this is enough. We are all UND fans and to say one is more of a fan than the other is SO. FREAKING. STUPID.

Chad > Kyle, IMO But, I'm a little biased

I'd probably say they were NDSU fans and then UND hockey fans. Is this considered part of the "hockey only crowd"? Am I doing this right? This is maddening.

Oh absolutely. No chance Minny beats SCSU, IMO.

I'd say size had much more to do with Rocco's draft spot than his scoring ability.

Lol..... good lord, boys.

Great quote about Marty Brodeur giving Schmaltzy the news he was going up for the first time.... "That was pretty cool," Schmaltz said. "I didn't really know what to say at the time. I was just kind of lost in his eyes, I guess, when he told me the news."

Never know if you never look it up

As my Dad always said to me.... look it up.

Frustrating to me because that's a five and no misconduct if that play is made with 5:30 minutes left. Does Stech deserve the 5? Absolutely. Not a suspendable hit, to me, but I understand it, I guess.

Two wins? They have fans predicting they will sweep a team who's been swept exactly 1 time since 2011 on the road, one time anywhere since 2013 and has lost 5 times on the season? Good lord.

Sure, but continued on multiple threads? Criticism is fine, to me, but it's moved into troll territory, IMO.

It was a cross check in the back going into the boards. Dangerous hit. I don't think he should sit though. If there were 5 minutes left, no way he sits the next game.

Can you tell me the reason you're trolling so hard? It's silly, man. Just knock it off.

I disagree lol. Like has been said repeatedly, he never made a play on the puck. Right to the legs.

I blame Biddco