stoneySIOUX

100% agree

Fine first. Gotta bury our chances. LaDue looking really good in the first. CBS inching towards some nice chemistry. Good to see #8 backchecking again.

Yup, yup. Only reason I'm calling a sweep in Omaha. It's a fanboy hunch, but I can't fight the feeling.

Yes sir. Sounds like the guys are about as healthy as they've been all year.

http://daddydumpandchase.blogspot.com/2016/02/friday-gameday-searching-for-sweep.html Sweep 4-2 good guys in green Pogo, Cag, Boeser (Schmaltz 3As), Pooly

Is that becoming more predictable than me calling a sweep?? Haha

DDC's take.... can the Sioux or Mavs find a sweep this weekend in Omaha?? bit.ly/1TbBBW5

Bye bye conspiracy theory lol.

Good point.

Agreed. I don't see why we wouldn't be in St. Paul if we are higher than them.

Agreed on all points.

They won't do it. The committee will protect the higher seed with the belief that SCSU will carry attendance in St. Paul. If Minny is in, they won't need anyone else, frankly.

To be the No. 1 seed in the regional, yes. If we fall to a No. 2 seed, we could absolutely be put there.

It's EXACTLY what they are doing... get the support from a group of people that are supporting their logos.... get twitter follows/mentions, facebook comments/shares, IG posts.... retweet, share, repost.... "HEY look at the potential new FH logo! These are sweet! I'd TOTALLY be on board if they looked like this!" .... exposure of brand.... $$$

No, they didn't. And it's not about any of us buying anything from them... it's about exposure. Every retweet/share/repost from a Sioux fan goes out to thousands of new people that can see their logos.

It's simple... get the support from a group of people that are supporting their logos.... get twitter follows/mentions, facebook comments/shares, IG posts.... retweet, share, repost.... "HEY look at the potential new FH logo! These are sweet! I'd TOTALLY be on board if they looked like this!" .... exposure of brand.... $$$ Well done, GLABS.

Great work. I really do like them both, but, you did it just for funsies? Looking for the cheap pop. Thanks for pandering to us. Bravo.

My guess.... they have PLENTY of ideas and stuff on paper, but we won't see many of them.

They started their own thread, btw. Tagged Sioux Forever, too.

Yeah, that was my question, too. So, doing this independently means what? UND already signed the contract with SME, right?

Dave Stafford called beats Jimmy Howard called by Doc Emrick. Minus the gaff, I'd love to hear this guy call Sioux games. Good stuff. Thanks Vegas!

Incredibly busy time of the year.

No, it does not mean that and I'm assuming that was a joke. Why this is maddening to me.... All of this talk is speaking in absolutes. - "Hockey only" fans don't support UND because they want to keep the Sioux name and don't yet buy into Hawks. - Supporters of Hawks are better fans than the Sioux holdouts - Hawks fans are betraying their Sioux history Can't we just agree to disagree and move on? The Sioux name is gone and is never coming back. FH is here to stay. HOWEVER, that DOES NOT MEAN that those who have yet to move on from the Sioux name won't eventually do so. For sake of this stupid thread, can we just allow people to figure it out for themselves? Who am I to judge someone who hasn't moved on yet from something that has been a part of them for a long time. And on the flip side, who am I to judge someone who has "moved on" and wears Hawks gear? 11 pages of this is enough. We are all UND fans and to say one is more of a fan than the other is SO. FREAKING. STUPID.

Chad > Kyle, IMO But, I'm a little biased

I'd probably say they were NDSU fans and then UND hockey fans. Is this considered part of the "hockey only crowd"? Am I doing this right? This is maddening.