What's a better determination of a conference champion, playing each of the 9 possible opponents in your conference once, or playing 8 of 13 possible conference opponents and having a championship game decide based upon divisions?
So the solution would have been to have Rice and SMU as members of the Big XII and re-play a game that's already been played to determine a conference champion. Got it.
Ley's try this: take Indiana and Purdue out of the Big 10 and don't play a Wisconsin vs Ohio State championship game. All of a sudden, the Buckeyes aren't worth of final four consideration?
Regardless of what happens, it's absolutely amazing how quickly TCU and Baylor have established themselves as Big XII powers. Oklahoma and Texas have run that conference for years (along with Nebraska, of course)...Gary Patterson and Art Briles are excellent coaches.
Ohio State lost to Virginia Tech! At home! I don't care if gfhockey was QB'ing the Buckeyes that day - that loss absolutely destroys the rest of their body of work.
That's the problem, isn't it? Does Wisconsin deserve a bid after getting beat 59-0 in its conference title game? Arizona also got worked over by Oregon. And they beat Arizona State.
Honestly, this season, I think the playoffs should include six teams - Alabama and Oregon get a bye in Round 1. FSU plays Baylor and Ohio State plays TCU. Problem solved.
I pointed that out after the Bemidji series...Their defensive seems to be a little too offensive-minded. Wilcox is good, but getting outshot badly in an NCAA tournament going could spell doom for the Gophers.
OK, let's try this on for size...an 8 team playoff:
Alabama, Oregon, Florida State, Ohio State, TCU, and Baylor are all IN. Who are your other two selections?