Bison06

As I look through the draft classes, I agree with you, Clemson also would be in that discussion, but that's it really.

It's gonna take NDSU missing on a QB. Depending on how you look at it, they've been incredibly fortunate or incredibly smart in recruiting the past 12 years at that position. I made this point before Trey Lance even came along, but I don't really think it can be argued at this point. NDSU has had possibly the best 3 quarterback trio of any school in the nation since Wentz took over. There isn't another school that can say they've had their last three QB's drafted and two in the first round(we'll see on Trey). Oklahoma and Ohio State would be the two I would put in the same discussion. I know that seems insane on it's face, but it's true when you look at the QB play NDSU has been blessed with.

I was a little young for his prime years, but his schtick sort of wore thin didn't it?

I've been hearing this same thing since 2013. That said, I do feel a shift happening right now within NDSU football. I felt it the minute Entz took over. He doesn't have a head coach mentality, nor does he conduct himself in a way that gives me confidence that he is the man for the job. A couple of quick examples, his insistence on "going with his gut" on when to go for two, he made some incredibly bone-headed decisions last year to go for two in my opinion, some of them worked out some didn't. Second example is the way he talks about his players. He reveals too much IMO. Last year someone asked a question about Ty Brooks and he said something to the effect of "Ty really thinks a lot of himself and he likes to tell you about it". That doesn't follow with the NDSU football ethos in my opinion, true or not, stuff like that stays in the locker room. He conducts himself much more the way a position coach would, he likes getting hyped up and getting emotional. Works for position coaches, but not head coaches. I guess we'll see how it plays out.

Incredibly intelligent virus. Can decide if your gathering is righteous or not before it decides to attack. Even knows which state you are in. Scary stuff.

With your incredible political insights that the highest paid consultants can’t see, why aren’t you getting paid millions to whisper in the ear of world leaders?

They don’t have near the population we have, nor do they have nearly the diversity in thought we have. New Zealand and Australian are completely isolated from the rest of the world. Cannot even begin to compare them. I believe it to be disingenuous on Shapiro’s part and your part to suggest that Trump could’ve responded in a way that wouldn’t have been spun negative.

Germany, Australia, Finland, South Korea and New Zealand. Which of those in any way demographically compares to the United States?

Which world leader would you point to as a success story?

If you're gonna do that, please let me know when so I can get on the proper side of the river.

Absolutely. I'm never a fan of someone in a position like his who seems to like the celebrity so much. It's too easy to get caught up in that and forget exactly what your role is if your in his position.

Now I feel better

...for you maybe

So if yesterday's market dip was Trump's fault for not negotiating a stimulus bill as the left says, who's fault is today's rally?

Every once in a while they say they quiet part out loud and their true thoughts are revealed. I wonder what could possibly be happening during that time frame that could change things, hmmm.

So 24 people died in the past three days that had a positive covid test in the last 30 days even if they died of something else, as long as it’s not on the exclusion list.

If Trump ends up winning this year, can we all agree moving forward that polls are absolutely worthless?

No I won't. If you can't look at those graphs and see that cases go up invariably following mask mandates then nothing I say will convince you.

If I'm a restaurant owner in Wisconsin right now I'm shutting it down. 25% capacity might as well be 0%. Restaurants can't operate at that capacity.

I never said I agree with him, in fact, I vehemently disagree with him. I'm just saying him holding a view that I find incorrect doesn't make him unintelligent as was suggested. Uninformed or misinformed? Sure.

Then what are you not seeing? The graphs are pretty clear.

I would agree with you if it had lead to a give and take from the governor, at least in Minnesota. You can't have it both ways though. Mask mandates in public and continued restrictions on restaurants and schools.

So you feel we've already gone too far and continue to go too far? Yet are arguing that more invasion is a necessary evil to help people feel protected?

Would you agree that invasion of privacy has the ability to go too far? If so, where is the line for you?

Did you click on the link or no?