Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Siouxperman8

Members
  • Posts

    2,282
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by Siouxperman8

  1. 15 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

    Who does the sit out a year rule benefit exactly?

    The schools that they are currently playing for and that have invested a lot of time and effort into them.  Like the FCS and FBS schools that can’t compete with the big NIL war chest schools and are getting their players poached.  

    I'm not against transferring but if it’s worth it to you you’ll  be willing to sit a year.  

    • Upvote 1
  2. An easy improvement would be to go back to requiring sitting out a year when transferring.  That would cut down on a lot of the transfers for NIL money.  
     

    I haven’t kept up enough to know if that was changed to meet a law or if it was ncaa whim.  

  3. 3 hours ago, fightingsioux4life said:

    Wow, a lot of "We just can't do it" thinking here.

    No wonder we can't build our non-hockey Division I programs, the "can't do" mentality prevents us from getting past square one.

    The "sit back and wait" approach won't work in this environment.

    I don't want to become the next Northern Colorado.

     

    4 hours ago, gfhockey said:

    We don’t have one

     

    ndsu does

     

    chaves is on record saying he wants to sit back and watch. Then think philosophical about whether we need it or not

    At this time schools are limited in what they can do regarding NIL but the NCAA is looking to change that. 

    I've seen this a couple of places:

    Current NCAA rules prohibit anyone in an athletic department from representing athletes in marketing deals, directly or indirectly, but schools are allowed to provide their athletes with education and some tools for connecting with boosters and business who might want to sign them to an NIL deal. 

     

  4. 39 minutes ago, petey23 said:

    Depends on if you care if the money for school is called an athletic scholarship or something else. Private schools have many ways of handling that.

     

    My youngest brother went to Concordia and he ended up getting about 65-70% of his school paid for.

    I was on the team at St John’s for 1 year.  The guys they wanted got most of their school paid for.  
     

    needless to say I was footing the whole bill myself. :D

    • Upvote 2
  5. 2 hours ago, siouxfan512 said:

    Isn't St Thomas non-scholly? Also not playoff eligible? I suppose if they have a grad program he wants then it might be a good fit, but if you can get some of that paid for, I'd be looking elsewhere.  Though maybe money isn't in the equation. Certainly a good program and good school.

    It is non scholarship.  I was thinking of an FCS team close to his home.  St Thomas has MBA program.  That’s where I got mine from. 

    • Like 1
  6. 1 minute ago, homer said:

    Again only my opinion- I think he’s an impact player in the Mountain West conference.  Could see some bigger opportunities but the injury doesn’t help him
     

    Talked to his dad at tailgating and he told me he needs surgery. 

  7. 12 hours ago, Sioux>Bison said:

    You know for a fact that these guys have “anonymous” birdies in their ears telling them they would have an offer if they transferred. It happens all the time, Tucker Kraft was offered 6 figures…… and then turned it down, but he was already a slam dunk draftee

    For sure somebody had to have his ear with unofficial offers if he has this much interest already

  8. 10 hours ago, UND1983 said:

    Talent is an issue, did you guys watch the game?

    Multiple times we had guys in position to stop the qb running around the end for a loss or little gain. Time and time again he  simply outran our def player and got 10-15 yards.  Also telling was he kept his eyes downfield looking for next tackler and wasn’t even concerned about the first guy. He knew he’d just outrun him to the edge.  We need more speed on the outside for sure. 

    • Upvote 3
×
×
  • Create New...