ScottM

Don't confuse him ...

That's a brilliant idea. Why don't you lay down on an on-ramp to I-29 and try to block traffic?

"Fargo envy"? Hardly. I used to live there.

I feel dirty from just hitting that link ...

Or just post pictures of his conquests from Efarmony ...

You're wasting your time. Guys like Fetch think life is made up of "Mulligans" and "do-overs", and have no real stake in the outcome.

You have to give them credit for pointing out the NC$$'s hypocrisy on this issue with regard to the Utes.

Soderstrom fails to grasp that even though SL recognizes the pipe ceremony, SR's government has explicitly disowned that ceremony. And both are "sovereign nations".

Any attorney who can argue "Divine Providence" with a straight face in an appellate court probably doesn't have much else going on ...

Which is pretty much what SR did with its own "pipe ceremony" that occurred on its own territory. If they don't recognize it, why should anybody else? Turning this into some bizarre "freedom of religion" argument? Was the Second Amendment too much of a stretch, or will that one show up later?

Well, obviously, they don't understand the "fundamental issues" either. But when SL wins its lawsuit, the petitions will scare the crap out of the NC$$ and everything will be sunshine and lollipops ....

I thought the deadline for all parties was today.

What's his "handle" on this board?

We are following the agreement and so is the NC$$. Hence, the sanctions imposed and reiterated by letter. Have you checked your water for lead?

Nobody's even accused them of breaking the agreement. At least those of us who have actually read it. And a "Yes" vote will have no impact on the NC$$. The only "victims" will be UND and its student-athletes who aren't "smarter" to go elsewhere ...

That's being "diplomatic" ...

"Rare"? The men's hockey team is almost always in the NC$$ tourney. The women's hockey team in it this year. And that says nothing about the BB teams, football, etc. And the NC$$ doesn't need to "increase sanctions" beyond what's in the settlement, since they're doing enough damgage. Keep striving for mediocrity, Fetch. It seems to suit you.

If that were indeed the case, you would realize how corrosive the Sioux moniker has become and will become for the school and see that it pursues its best interests as a member of the NC$$. And those best interests do not intersect with the purported interests of SL at this point.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/46167125/ The TV show is currently airing.

What's this "we"? You've made it quite clear you're willing to sacrifice UND and its student-athletes when you have no ties to the school whatsoever. All so you can wear a jersey. And if you're counting on SL to win their litigation, keep counting.

I'm kind of curious why Clueless Al, et. al., didn't decide to pull this "legislation" in 2007 when the settlement was signed. If he was so concerned about the power of the Board, that would have been a perfect time to "right this injustice".

http://www.inforum.c...0/group/sports/ What's this "we" you're talking about, Sean? What are the impacts of the sanctions on you? You left campus years ago, and were never an athlete then either.

It's The Wild ... They'll probably try to bring in Neil Broten next season.

Clueless Al's "thinking" on higher education was the subject of a number of conversations about the same time he decided to "save" the Sioux moniker for UND. I believe most UND and SU fans agreed on that point on this board. Anybody who's paying attention saw the moniker issue as a proxy for his own political agenda.

In other words, the "current board" isn't doing what Clueless Al wants, so he wants to reset the clock to turn it into a political proxy. And who's this Sean Johnson tool bag? Al's "side action"?