neoflex

They do a bit winded. Giving up too many opportunities

I was at the game in '11. UND outplayed them, but once Michigan got the lead they clogged the lanes, played only defense, and didn't let much of anything near the goal. But that was then, and this is now. Payback time.

So...do we pull Cam? Not that he's looking bad, maybe just to rest him and his psyche

Wow. One thing to look lackadaisical, but it's another to look just bad.

Hope I'm wrong regarding tonight

hate to even bring this up, but Cam, has not been sharp as of lately. The D certainly has not played well either, but some of those goals last night by DU were pretty soft.

1-1...poganski

Lucky to get the 2 points... almost, maybe should have, had none. But nice to see them get some points.

Cmon offense...let's see some dazzle

5 goals on 19 shots...that's horrendous

desperation time

we'll have to pull the goalie w/ 3 to go...as we've had no sustained offensive pressure

most shots are now coming from near the blue line

Seriously...put johnson back in net

I agree; however I didn't have to sleep on it. For those that are supporting the new nickname, that's great. For those of us that are detractors of the name, we still support and love our University of North Dakota, but just have been fed up with this "unbiased" process and think the new name is lame. To put it simply: "I don't want to sell anything, buy anything, or process anything that says Fighting Hawks as a career. I don't want to sell anything bought or processed, or buy anything sold or processed, or process anything sold, bought, or processed, or repair anything sold, bought, or processed that says Fighting Hawks. You know, as a career, I don't want to do that......."

"Here's your University of North Dakota Fighting Hawks SCORING!..." yeah, that's sounds pretty lame. (I would say gay, but that's not too PC these days. As then we would need a committee to determine a more appropriate derogatory word to describe this debacle of an unbiased process).

Because a committee member would otherwise come out and say they were forced into choosing these 5 names or rather forced to leave UND off the ballot.....RIGHT??

It sounds like the committee was told or rather forcibly advised to choose a name...and keeping it North Dakota could not, would not, ever be on the ballot. So in other words, the most popular choice...is not on the ballot, because it to is not PC enough for our administration.?

This thread is hilarious.....good call

A lot of frustration being thrown out here, and can't blame anyone. But Hak did a great job coaching this team, unfortunately our goalie played a great game at times...and his worst.

Well good night folks...going across the street to get a beer. See ya next season

There goalie is playing Very well....we are out shooting them.

Well...we can either have a spectacular finish...or end the game like we did in the F4 in Denver. Let's see who comes out