AZSIOUX

screw the gophers, go maimi!

see if hak will let landon snider start for SS to get him some game minutes this season

would be sweet and i remember a boston outdoor game talk last year but that never happened with bc and bu facing 2 western teams. they would take a big 10 team like minny/mich without a doubt over the sioux unless donny boy didnt want to risk frostbite for his players maybe sioux/gophers non conference 1 year outdoors would be fun as hell

nice to see jonny out there after that amount of stitches but concussions are one thing you dont mess around with

its tough but i dont think there is a easy bracket out there. kick scsu around the rink this weekend as cc will lose 1 game to DU!!

new one up with umd in after that rule was wrong saying you needed to have a .500 overall record to get in tourney, they sure should make that a rule but im guessing in the end there wont be a team in with a record under .500 http://www.uscho.com/news/id,15385/Bracket...March52008.html This Week's Brackets Colorado Springs Minn.-Duluth vs. Colorado College Minnesota vs. Miami Madison Wisconsin vs. New Hampshire Minnesota State vs. Michigan State Albany Army vs. Michigan St. Cloud State vs. Clarkson Worcester Bemidji State vs. North Dakota Boston College vs. Denver Conference Breakdown WCHA - 8 CCHA - 3 HEA - 2 ECAC - 1 CHA - 1 AHA - 1

do i think he will stay? yes i do but that doesnt mean he isnt a flight risk. you never know these days with what nhl teams are thinking

yes he is and you are correct regarding the 4 years then signing a player can be risky

thats exactly right

exactly and what many fans have to realize is that when we talk about players going pro it doesnt mean they are nhl ready. there are only a handful of players every year that can leave college then be on a nhl roster the next season. ej, toews ect..... in hockey its all about development and thats what the ahl is for. i always see posts saying are you kidding me or no way hes nhl ready and they are right but there are steps needed to be taken before they get the chance to play in the nhl if thats the case

3 years seems to be the norm for top d men for the sioux heading to the pros. greene, commdore, smaby ect.... he will be gone with a few others as we know

there has been talk on here about him, if he does end up at und then maybe he will be a older recruit. the eagle part deux

that was a fun game to be at, goehring on top of his game along with the whole team beating miller and the spartans!

i think the whole panzer was robbed comes back to be a joke at the end of the day even though he had the numbers and miller had a hell of a year. if the player has the numbers and the hobey qualifications then i myself dont care what year he is in school. its not a lifetime achievement award but i understand your take on it as everyone has their own way to look at it. ps...........panzer was robbed

or he said potential which im sure they may be a few here and there on different teams

i said 5 will make it having 3 bubble teams not making it especially if they get swept in the wcha playoffs. now if you win one, lose one and win game 3 then lose in the thursday play in game you can also get bounced depending on what happens around the country and who you lose to.

no way its a junior or senior award. best player that fits the criteria should win the hobey freshman through senior

hes a damn good goalie as well and deserves to be in the talk. if the sioux keep it up phil will end up in the hobey hattrick!

its porters to lose but like you said it would be great to see phil there in the end. a few more goose eggs for phil and the sioux and then he becomes a serious threat.

oh yeah, for sure. its fun looking at it as of now just for that reason as its crazy to see 8 teams in but in the end we all know there wont be that many

8 teams wont get in, it will be 5 more than likely as wcha first round matchups will knock 2 or 3 out off their bubble.

im sure there are some potential ones but like mentioned gleason is the only actual recruit still in

a new bracketology will be coming today as it was a mis print regarding the team having to have a .500 record or better overall per uscho.com The WCHA has eight teams meeting the NCAA tournament selection criteria after all. A new qualifying provision that seemed to require a team to have at least a .500 overall record for an at-large bid has been identified by the NCAA as a misprint in the 2008 Championship Handbook, in an email received by USCHO.com. According to the NCAA, the handbook is being corrected for republication. That's good news for sub-.500 Minnesota Duluth, currently tied for 13th in the PWR, but not so much for Providence or Notre Dame. Jayson Moy's Bracketology column will be republished later today. hopefully they change that rule to make it so a team cant get in with a record under .500. pathetic if any team does get in under .500

good for them, their favorite player still wont come close to sniffing a hobey

those damn tech kids they only count 1%. they dont mean a thing. just a ploy to get fans involved in the process.