Cratter

Its a short clip but you can see it on twitter...also can see the team arriving at the airport.

Yes both have made the dance once. Brewster made the dance at home. League changed the rules afterwards and Jones had to win at Neutral site. Minus those seasons... Jones has been in the championship game and the semifinals twice. Brewster has not played in the championship game and only made the semifinals once. When not reaching the goal...Jones has shown he's more capable than Brewster at getting closer to it.

I'll say it again....if the goal is to reach the dance. Brian Jones has done a better job over the years than Travis Brewster.

Took UND only five years what Northwestern just finally did.

Tom Millers twitter had the NCAA website to watch it online. Even though its a little late posting this. http://www.ncaa.com/march-madness-live/watch

#buttrpi

Yeah all under the bridge now. I get what they are trying to say. All Good. Go SiouxHawks. (I edited to more clearly reflect).

I'm saying that's not how statistics work. You don't add the AL and the AQ. They can and are mutually exclusive. DU does not have a 51% chance to get an at large bid right now. ....I just find it funny if DU losses the semifinal game on Friday their 51% chance at an at large bid jumps to 100%. I get what they are trying to say now.

OK good point.

Take Providence for example....rated below UND is the pairwise, but according to CHN has a greater chance to be in the tournament than UND....87% vs 99% Huh? Providence has a 99% chance to be in the national tournament?! LOL

Say both lose in the tournament meaning the AQ Column is automatically meaningless....then the only column left is to look at is the "at large" column. Lowell according to the CHN app says has a greater chance than DU; 80% vs 51% chance at an at large bid. But if they both lose in AQ, CHN will update the AL column to more accurately reflect, and those number will switch to DU having a higher percent chance than Lowell. Just horrible semantics on their part.

Huh? You really think Umass Lowell has a higher chance at an at large bid than Denver?

with two play in games recently added its become harder for it to happen though.

Which is not how you do statistics. The CHN says Denver has only a 51% chance at large (AL) bid...(which is obviously wrong.) vs Umass-Lowells 80% chance of an at large bid...yeah okay.

Because No NCAA MBB #1 seed has lost their opening game to a #16.

It's like having #16 Holy Cross avoid playing #1 Minnesota in the first game of the NCAA Mens Hockey Tournament....

Noticed UND has a 7% chance to win two games this weekend. Edit: I'm starting to question College Hockey News more and more.....It says Denver only has a 51% chance to make the tournament if they don't win the automatic qualifier.

So UND goes to March Madness for the first time and no one took a video of the team cutting down the nets?

The women's team is playing in an optional tournament. So not necessarily.

I'm not going to be a happy camper if UND didn't even send someone to Reno with a camera to record post game celebrations (cutting down the net) and post it to their youtube channel.

about eleven five.

All this poor attendance talk before the series started.....how'd it turn out?

Fargo Billiards League.

I'm hoping either Womens hockey is cut or Idalski is fired. I'd settle for one at the moment. With the great year basically every major sport at UND is having it really shows Idalski's inadequacy.

#Wewantbama Does that work for basketball too?