The Sicatoka

Last time I read it, the medical hardship rule said that you can't play in more than 20% of your team's games, and none in the second half of the season, to apply for the medical hardship waiver (commonly called a medical redshirt). If he wants a full season of eligibility next year, hold him out.

DIA Idaho averaged just 1433 more per home game (10931 vs. 9455) in 2002 than UND. They are one of the first candidates to be moved back down to DIAA under the new "average 15000 fans per home game" rule. Toss in the fact that the Sun Belt is losing teams, due to all the conference realignment, and Idaho just might have been wise if they kept the Big Sky offices on speed-dial. That's a tough scenario to walk into.

Image is nice. Performance matters.

Sounds similar to UND at MSU-Mankato and UND at USD. (Half might be a little strong, but there was significant "green" in the stands.)

So DI athletics improves research and academics? Better tell that to MIT and Cal Tech (a pair of DIIIs).

Look, study, evaluate: Yes. Give honest answers to the hard questions: Yes. Follow recommendations of experts (especially ones you hired): Yes. Most importantly, do what is fiscally most responsible for the University: Yes. The last two NCC road football games for UND concern me: at MSU-Mankato - attendance 1888 at USD - attendance 3411 Also this past weekend: NDSU at SCSU (last game ever at Selke Field) - under 5000 That doesn't say good things about the health of the NCC. Alternatively, I'm interested to see the turnout for Concordia-St. Paul at NDSU this weekend. I want to see the turnout when there's really not much to play for. It's probably a good indicator of what would happen with any NCC team's attendance during a transition.

I know this is late .... sorry. Either one sign or three (sequentially): Non-Factor! Three signs would be Non- Fac- tor! Perfect for both the penalty box glass and pre-game intros.

I know this is late .... sorry. Either one sign or three (sequentially): Non-Factor! Three signs would be Non- Fac- tor! Perfect for both the penalty box glass and pre-game intros.

"My dad said this is the nicest facility in North America." -- Brady Murray speaking about Ralph Engelstad Arena. "Dad" is the head coach of the LA Kings. Yeah, I know, in court that's "hearsay" evidence.

Ahem. Who's Truman comment? (Suddenly I feel like Rodney Dangerfield.) BTW - Hoover was the first born west of the Mississippi.

Next he'll be reporting that Truman was elected President.

Personally, I'd say lose "The Superstar" Mike Morris, aka "all Vikings talk, all the time" too. Put "Tim (Hennessy) and (Scott) Swyg(man)" on both KKXL 1440 AM in Grand Forks and KVOX 1280 AM Fargo during their morning show. And how about getting the Sioux Coaches Show on KVOX AM too.

That may well be the case, but it still doesn't refute this

Let's look at 3000 to 4000 people for a USHL game: Those are teams playing in a city with no real "connection" to the population (other than the occassional hometown player). The USHL is drawing 3000 to 4000 without deep roots in the community. Imagine a hockey team with strong hometown connections, like a team wearing the logo of the local university. Des Moines, Waterloo, Cedar Rapids, Sioux City: That's four in Iowa. Toss in "River City" (formerly Omaha, now playing across the river in Council Bluffs) to make five. That's five in a 12 team league and two more (Sioux Falls and Lincoln) are short drives to the Iowa border. But there's no hockey interest in Iowa.

I've wondered why other schools with strong USHL franchises (and decent hockey facilities) in town haven't followed the "Omaha" model and started DI hockey. Examples: Sioux Falls -- Augustana or USD or SDSU Waterloo -- Northern Iowa Des Moines -- Drake or Iowa State Cedar Rapids -- U of Iowa The model shows that a school can fund a very significant portion of their athletic budget from hockey revenues.

Folks, we know Roebuck prefers a cramped-feeling home gym with people hanging right on the court. Look at the inside edge of that roof truss relative to the top row of seating. I think it's designed to feel "cozy." We also know that even with "The Beaz" last year, UND mens hoops averaged 500 less than capacity of that place. I still believe that REA is "home court" as a recruiting tool and that only the games that are obviously going over the 4000 seating capacity will be in The House that Ralph Built. I can't prove it. Call it a gut feeling. Time will tell. PS - Only 133 of 327 DI mens BB and only 23 DI womens BB teams averaged more per game last year than REA-SC holds.

See more here.

Now it's off to Vermillion with control over your own destiny. Don't let all the hard work against Omaha go to waste. The DakotaDome is a tough place to play so don't look beyond it. One by one.

They seed to avoid teams from the same conference playing in round one (except where impossible, meaning three from one conference).

Lost in this week's poll is the new #1 in the West Region.

Trevor and Tyler are Craig's twin boys.

It's simple math: 9534 in a 13500 seat arena will be louder than 9010 in a 19000+ seat arena. The crowd at the UNO game was pretty mellow. I think everyone was on a post-Halloween-candy-sugar-high crash. The crowd only came alive at the very end. I wasn't surprised to read similar "dead crowd" reports from the Bison game in the Forum.

And in that scenario, the question becomes: Who do they invite to play in their new sandbox? PS - Isn't there a team in Utah somewhere that is an NCAA member but their mens soccer (?) team is playing in a semi-pro league? I remember reading a story about that some time ago.

You don't have to tell me that. However, you need to convince one of your fellow Bison fans.