The Sicatoka

I believe Twin Cities based Vikings fans can answer that for you. They faced blackout for not sell out Metrodome recently. It's a standard NFL practice: Sold out 72 hours before kickoff or blacked out.

A kid from Grand Forks named "Jean-Phillippe". What next.

So "JP" is coming back from the Devils organization? Anyone tell Phillippe Lamoureux yet?

Is the 360 the only reason? Given Kupchella (and Harmeson before) are saying the law precludes them from discussing the issue publicly, and that everything in a public employee's record is public except for medical and medically related issues, clearly, we do not know everything there is to know.

Jeff's brother Mike played for UND.

Is that rhetorical or do you really want my answer?

That voice from that guy is like hearing Barry White's voice from Pee Wee Herman.

A dismissal (not even an LoA) with no reason given? We need to know all about this! Where's Mike McFeely? Let's face it: This name is probably more recognized regionally than UND's on-leave AD! Details! Stories! Page One, 72 point font headlines! PCM: Would you be available to teach "What goes around comes around 101" for a certain television General Manager? [/cynicism] OK, now that that's over, I'm guessing KVLY's GM did what needed to be done (or he wouldn't have done it and possibly put ratings in jeopardy). Let the man do his job.

Mike Fink had a pretty ordinary night in Waterloo tonight (L 2-1, Cedar Rapids). He created a couple scoring opportunities for linemates (they didn't finish) when established in the offensive zone and got a shift on the PK, but looked like he was learning more than playing when the puck was loose or in CR's possession. It's a jump from HS to USHL (and he's the youngest forward on the Waterloo roster). Former Fargo Southie Paul Weisgarber got Waterloo's only goal.

If that's what you have to keep telling yourself so you can get to sleep tonight ...

H. David Wilson was 360 reviewed and is Dean of Medicine today. Robert Boyd was 360 reviewed and is Vice President today. Tom Buning was 360 reviewed and .... Why review at all?

And now Kupchella says he's prevented from discussing Buning's LoA. Not surprised. For those of you who didn't follow the link the first time: That's what I can find as about the only reason Kupchella and Harmeson would take the "no discussion" stance. As far as blaming the VPGA for this, he did a standard practice (360 review) and has to deal with the findings. Why blame him for doing his job?

Exactly. I'm not saying anyone's doing a terrible job. I'm looking for a breath of fresh air.

Sadly, market rate is going to go up no matter what. That's the constant. Consider it more bang for the buck. And instead of the MSU (can't manage a clock vs Concordia) Moorhead Dragons or UM-Crookston it'll be Alpo, er, I mean Valpo and such.

That's the norm. NDSU last year got and this year is getting a check from Minnesota. (This year that should be vice versa. ) UND got a check from UNI. Smaller budget teams will only walk into buzz-saws for a price.

Penn State must be really bad as they lost to Michigan, who lost to Appalachian State, who lost to Wofford. For some reason, it seems that the lines (FBS/FCS/top, very top DII) are blurring.

Since folks are into quoting me, and timelines, I'll follow suit and note I long, long ago said: Instead, the Herald was clued in to start digging really hard. How? By this site. The Herald has more than once said things about "internet sites" discussing the situation. Instead of a dismissal that could have been readily handled quietly, behind the scenes, by "mutual agreement" or some other polite phrasing in a news release, we now have a mess, a very public and unforgiving mess. And those on the "inside" could've smirked knowingly what "mutual agreement" really meant while the "unknowing" masses speculated if winter was too cold for a guy originally from Florida. As an added bonus we now have the "Buning letter" to Harmeson (it's a good read if your name is "Joe Chapman" and you need a laugh at your neighbor's expense). I'm sure it's being copied to eternity by some of UND's "friends". I'm guessing they'll be enclosing a copy to everyone on their Christmas card list. I'll give you August 20 .... if you give me June 12.

They're the guys with the RV in the first "Blues Brothers" movie.

Dig around the NDUS site. There has to be a review procedure that solicits feedback from all interfaces with a particular job: supervisors, peers, and those who report to. (Every organization has some method to do that.) I'd be surprised if it hadn't always been there. It got used. The result was found under open records. And?

I thought it was August 5. Never mind.

A little math here folks: - Harmeson is an attorney (as well as VP) and knows the law - Harmeson says he's legally prevented from discussing Buning's LoA - Buning is a public employee at a public institution in an open records state - Performance reviews of Buning are being made public by the press (as they are open record) - Yet, Harmeson maintains he can not discuss the matter at this time. So why can't Harmeson talk about why the LoA? Well, there are some employment related matters that can not be included in an open record (and thus public discussions). Paragraph 4 is the one that applies to NDUS employees. Curiouser and curiouser.

That's an AAD position, not the AD position.

My Sprinturf field has lower long-term maintenance costs. As far as sunshine, pick a seat by the glass wall.

I saw it at 10:00. Given how that document had to be modified (to protect privacy per NDUS policy and ND law) how could anyone decipher who signed that? The signer block was covered! They flashed it on screen for a second and the key sentence highlighted (by WDAY) said something like (not sure on exact wording) "I request a leave of absence". Who else would "I" be? I'd like to see the document for longer than a flash on the screen.

Idle back there sparky .... http://siouxsports.com/forums/index.php?s=...st&p=272544