Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

GDPritch

Members
  • Posts

    1,828
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

5,079 profile views

GDPritch's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Dedicated
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

  1. Agree. Thought same thing.
  2. Must be based on their strength of schedule.
  3. Agree. The Friday night cross check put on Dylan James by a CC player was up in the head/face area. How was that not 5?
  4. Good point. Sioux had won 8 straight while CC had not won a game since Nov. Plus, it’s a road game against a goalie who hasUND’s number. Something had to give and it did. Besides, can’t win them all. Lose again tonight at CC though and that’s a little troubling considering next wknd we face Denver.
  5. I’m guessing though if Homer let in two softies you’d be saying he shouldn’t start at all again barring a complete collapse by Spunar.
  6. Fair question. Makes no sense really. You have nothing to gain and everything to lose.
  7. Agree. It’s ridiculous how many turnovers they continue to have. They are a turnover machine.
  8. Yep. It sure shows. In comparison, our peers are ranked as follows: S Dak St 47 - NDSU 49 - Mont St 84 - S Dak 95 - Mont 263 - UND 318
  9. Made just 5 of 25 treys.
  10. Yikes is right! Another wretched performance. Of 363 teams, UND is rated #318 while W Kentucky is only rated #315 but they are light years better, winning UND 80-60 over UND. UND can’t shoot (today ( of 25 on treys) , commit tons of turnovers (26 today!), lack size/length, athleticism, etc. They do not have mid-major D-1 caliber athletes.
  11. There is an argument? You will get no argument from me. The portal (unfettered free agency) has ruined college sports (especially at the mid-major level) speaking from a fan/viewing perspective.
  12. same here…but that may change in the next year or two max.
×
×
  • Create New...