scpa0305

I'm still high on schmaltz. He came in as an offensive defenseman and that's exactly what he's been. As for LJ, not exactly sure what type of player he will end up being. Judging purely on what I've seen (and that's a ton of games) I think he may be more of a third line player (and I was really high on him coming in). He does win draws but each game I watch he starts looking more like grinder that doesn't go very hard. He tends to take lazy stick penalties at terrible times and he simply doesn't hit the stat sheet like a top 6 forward. Also, his footspeed must improve. Hopefully he puts it together by his junior/senior year. We're going to need him.

Cpmpletly agree. Blow these guys out, let the boys have fun and pad their stats.

Agreed, but how does UND fall to #3 with a split against one of the top teams in the entire country? Confused by that one. Not a big deal however, we moved up one in the pairwise which is the only one that counts.

Agreed, zero defense from both teams. It looked like a men's league game. I do think Michigan is better then their record though.

Agreed.

Although getting Boeser, Matthews, Jost or Fabbro are long extreme long shots they would all be offered a spot if they wanted to come here. Hak would make room for them.

Hope we can land Jost.

Agreed. We just cannot even come close to losing against this team. I would like to see Hak be aggresive and let his guys put up big numbers this coming weekend. I don't want him "trying things" just because we are playing a weaker opponent. These are the games our guys can fill the stat sheet, which is always fun. I wouldn't mind seeing Cam play if we blow them out bad on Friday.

Sucker punch by Pattyn. Not a fan of that.

Boys need to play a complete 3rd.

They would make room.

Panz makes me nervous every time he touches the puck.

Yup the guys been hot. I'll go with 3-2 as well. Late comeback.

Why are you hating on the guy, former UND player/coach.

Agreed, except for the 2nd half of the last sentence.

My apologies, I was talking about the second goal.

Sandy had his boys ready that's for sure. I really like their motivation. They sure bring it. We really could have used that one.

Gut check time tonight. Boys looked bad, excluding McIntyre.

Sure.

Why is 27 on the ice?

Go watch the play again. Watch 28.

What about pattyn? You tend to pick on specific players only.

Why is Luke Johnson on the ice on a 4x4? Face offs? He isn't offensive whatsoever, not at this point. Also pattyn gets posterized bad.

What now?

Blown away they didn't call the dive, pretty much text book.