geaux_sioux

It's not our fault that other teams miss on guys.

Nice. I really like the size and attitude of this guy. Length is also a plus.

Nick S

Who's ready for next year?

2 days after the end of the season Will Ratelle cleaned 406 lbs....

I sent an email to Faison and Walton. Walton replied how I figured she would. Basically she reiterated the whole request for proposals process and how UND is not soliciting or accepting suggestions outside of that process. It seems clear that the only way the public will get what they want is to make enough noise. Once again the best way is bombard Faison, Kelley, Walton, and Johnson with emails expressing your opinion in a professional way.

Big ones?

Just not at RB. It's just not for him.

Tim Dulin tweeted that he went from 174lbs to 190lbs already..... I bet he's at or above 200 by spring. He seems to be putting in the work to be a beast.

Very humble young man.

I would have gone with hearty, loyal, and honest but that's just me I guess.

Might make a real nice OLB? If he could make it at safety that size would be nice to have back there.

Interesting. Must have been my subconscious.

New offer. Great size and plays with an edge. Very interesting prospect. http://www.hudl.com/athlete/4294824/highlights/304671391/v2

If you want a local artist or designer to do the logo the best bet as always is to email the people in charge like Faison Walton Kelley and Johnson and let them know.

For example. ^ that is the correct green.

Yup, I used the official colors. The green got all jacked up. Going through imgur helped though.

Another issue of mine with going very basic is that hawks have a great variety of tones and colors in their feathers. Oh look, this hawk is wearing a head dress, someone call the NCAA ^^^^

My issue is that the more bare it gets the more it looks like other hawk logos.

How do you mean? I can adjust things to see how it would look if I get a little more to work with.

Like this?

Here is the tweaked version of the green one. I personally prefer this one to the original green one that I posted because of the added white accents.

That's the problem. No connection to UND. How could they possibly understand the standard? They don't know the struggle of the past 15 years. I find it hard to believe that a logo from some random company would be accepted the same way as a local design.

This one is growing on me a little bit. Try and envision it with the proper green though. Still not sure why it gets so different on this site.

You'll have to be more specific. Which white one and which lines?