geaux_sioux

College hockey is. When I was in HS more people attended football games. And as far as pros go I find it hard to believe that hockey is ahead of football.

Troy Hansen. He was a good looking recruit.

Losing the LB and OL hurt though. They were two of our best recruits.

Looks like theyll remain wide open.

We got burned by two very good recruits last year. Maybe the coaches are being more cautious with the Great White North.

Sweet. So have a bunch of other guys nobody has ever heard of.

We need to have basketball be strong along with football volleyball and hockey at a minimum. I'd love to get back to having an overall strong athletic department instead of a one sided one.

I tried to find international numbers but there isn't a system like we have for US HS.

Why is that?

1.1 million HS participants in football last year in the US. 45 thousand HS participants in hockey in the US. I wonder which one is more popular?

.... Was 100% true.

Jerry Rice Randy Moss Walter Payton

Is 33% the highest producer?

College hockey is second in production of pros. FCS is second in production of pros. Sounds pretty similar to me.

Wentz at WR til he can throw again? Honestly I bet he'd be good. Probably not worth the risk though.

Couldn't care less about those teams unless we play them. I'm a UND fan and because of that an FCS fan. Before that I was a D2 fan where our team did as well as possible in 2001 winning THE championship.

I disagree. It's as good as our team can possibly do. To me that makes it THE championship.

This isn't 100% true.

Anyone know anything about this guy? We've offered him and he looks like he would make a nice and big OLB. http://www.hudl.com/athlete/5579943/highlights/289121393/v2

UNI has a great secondary. I hope ours can look like theirs in the near future.

Yes. You just add a thick stroke of white to give contrast to the background.

I do love when big safeties that may be a step slow slide down to LB where they become a very fast LB. Worked out great for Dayo and Disterhaupt.

Gonna go ahead and disagree with you about the Montana game. We are competitive against them with Studsrud at QB.

Absolutely. Even thought the score was close because of a terrible call and a hit to the head the cause a fumble in our own redone we absolutely dominated them. Their scoring drives we like 2 and 12 yards because of the two TOs.

No, if we had a team that had stayed healthy and hadn't evolved throughout the year and hadn't been piss pounding teams down the stretch after we got our qb back then my enthusiasm for how this season went would be tempered. Given how our season went and the expectations and questions going in I'd say, even with the 3 losses in a row without our qb, it was a success. We blew past expectations. I'm a little bitter about the ISU and WSU games but those are the types that we will win in the future with improved depth and experience. I also only care about how Fluff teams do in the playoffs because it factors into our ability to get at large bids. Unlike most Fluff teams we are built for the playoffs and can play in any weather. I also think that, thanks to the NDSU game, we are now ready for any atmosphere.