Frozen4sioux

But would it both shock you... and also not shock you to find out the answer to that.

This is also why litigation of these things gets very very messy, very costly and very time consuming... with little to any actual benefit in "winning" for either parparty... i.e. http://thelegalblitz.com/blog/2012/02/28/the-battle-over-the-fighting-sioux-an-ip-perspective/

Tough to say, UND has a long history of certain sports refusing to adopt the logo of the school and trying to create their own identity.

Port was just a patzi... Farmed out after they tried to get this done by others. This hit piece came 100% from the hockey hating football faction of HAWKZI leadership in the parking lot of the Alerus. They've been trying to get traction for weeks and only college athletic hating Port would sleezeball themselves up enough to write it. They where always going to try to try tie this to the Engelstad foundation and REA as well.... Even after they knew that was false... they've been hinting at it the entire forum and now are just saying it straight out. Walking a very very fine line by the way... "jest"... nice try bud. You wrote the quiet part out loud. Only a fool can't see the purpose behind this all now.

You can easily know this not in what he wrote.. but in what he didnt write.. and the manner in which he went after the vaugley veiled allegations as opposed to facts. Thats the difference between a journalist and a sleezeball masterclickbaiter ..... who you all put faith into to "get someone".... and at the end of the day. What you have is a big ol burger full of ... nothing. A nothingburger.. . and now you know, the...... rest of the story. GoofDAY

Yes Schloss was well aware I'd imagine Or... he literally Port knew the full story... He knew exactly whatvand why he told only the one side

No both the Brien logo and the geometric where very clear cut TM The alternate interlocking UND was also solidly owned and trademarked

Not really sure you want to wade into the muddied water of trade mark on the Notre Dame interlocking UND Or the Blackhawk... It safe to say that UND has a bit of troubled history of playing fast and loose with logos and trademarks and...

The Brien Logo was used appropriately on the jersey... Real question... why was Football so stubborn in refusing to use the official logo of athletics on their helmet... It's like the program was trying to create their own alternative identity.

It's not normally advised. Who's in charge of this at UND? There's the story.

Port kinda maybe inferred this.. purposely vague btw. Anyone with half a brain can figure it out Rink Live reporter just made it clear. Ports article loses everything if he actually told the whole truth.... but then he wouldn't get the chance try and throw college athletics in the mud

UND is. NODAK LLC hasn't. How is this difficult?

As of now it's taxable value.

There's hockey outside of Grand Forks?

What has UND paid to any license holder? Zero. Who has paid anything to any license holder? Nobody. Nothing. Zilch. As stated by sleezeball.... ... buried in his attempts at character assassination... It's also a problem, from the perspective of the state of North Dakota, that UND began using a trademark and selling significant amounts of merchandise emblazoned with that trademark without first settling the question of ownership or licensing. What does 0% of 0 equal ? Go to Scheels and look at the tag for a NODAK sweater. Start there.

It does look stupid.... I hate it. The Fighting Hawks logo should be on both sides. After the redesign I hope it will be.

Another slate of good games tonight. Got my eye on Central and FSS

What's in the heart is a hell of alot more important thats what's on the back... or front... or sides... - Herb Brooks - Micheal Scott

Maybe explain yourself... or the behind the scenes moves you described trying to "expose" this.... Which is kinda like leaking nudes of a playmate... hut you sure seemed like you where well"in the know" of who this was being "taken to".. you know.... before it had to be farmed out the The sleezeball Port.

Well partially..... It's on half the helmet... If football would actually buy into the logo it'd be on both sides. Hockey puts it on both shoulders.

Fair Use Doctrine.. Educational purposes. Ya'll been edumacated. That's not very internet forum of you.

ANOTHER.....

There is apparently intend behind making those appearences appearent.

Was not referencing your post. You are 100% absolutely correct. The NHL jersey info was to point out a different corporate labeling and licensing to him. CCM.. Adidas.... just owned branding on aparel.. (i.e. hockey jersey) CCM equipment is a brand now owned by a Canadian holding company CCM aparel branding which was retained and relabeled Adidas ... as you correctly point out, has nothing to do with who manufacturers the sweater. That's likely sourced out to a Canadian manufacturing company.

I don't think the understanding of a perk is in line with something his contract allows.... but the part of it being fully disclosed ... that seems quite important... pertinent, even.