Bisonfan1234

Maybe our recruited players, but you're forgetting about our transfers. Definately D1 caliber.

Basketball is the winter sport of the USA, not hockey.

I can only hope the Big Suck Conf. rejects us. Would rather start our own conf. if we can't get into the Gateway.

Yilek and Moe both look very promising. Wrestling guys are usually good linemen.

No no, don't get me wrong, i *DO* think that the Big Sky conf is worthless. Gateway is much better.

You're right! The Big Sky conf is pretty worthless.

throw it on geocities and type in the URL here.

The amount of Ad hominems used by UND'ers on this board always amazes me too!

Lies.

Actually we *DON'T* want you play you anymore, on to bigger and better things. Some of the old school fans are pissed that the rivalry has ended, that's about it.

Yeah they're pretty good for a D2 school.

1. I don't know personally, i was just speculating. Just common sense. 2. Lately you have had success and you do hold the overall record but you hardly have won 100% of the time. 3. UND isn't the class football program of the NCC 4. It obviously IS college hockey history if all the players and coaches came from colleges!! And UND had only one member. It has a big reflection on UND since UND only had one member they obviously weren't a big power in college hockey back then. 5. Everything except the 1980 Olympic team was speculation.

I was simply stating that there are very few schools where the pride and joy is hockey. UND, UAA, SCSU are a couple i can think of. As a football athlete, it can be weird to know that football plays second fiddle where as other schools football is the major bread winner. Also, you want to talk about history? Look at this website: http://www.ushockeyhall.com/1980teamroster.htm Most of them are from the UMN and UB. BGSU and UMN-Duluth even have 2 players on the team where UND had ONE!! HA!

Talk about far fetched! But i suppose it could happen. What do you guys think?

I think it's safe to say the winners of the MAC and MWC should get the 2 at large unless there is an outstanding team from the WAC or CUSA.

One other thing about conference championship games: USC didn't play one. This can mean that all conferences have to choose their champion based only on record, in which case Oklahoma would've won, or they have to play a championship game in which case USC would have had to be co-champs with Wazzou since they were the second best.

The obvious answer is a playoff...but how can you guaranty that it will make as much money as the BCS? Also how many teams? is 32 too many? I think 32 could be good.

If there were a play-off, Boise State would get their asses kicked in by real D1A schools. They barely beat TCU for crying out loud. It's just another pathetic biased human poll that could rank such a team that high. I hate human polls and their biasedness and i get sick when the BCS commissioner or whatever wants to have more emphasis on biased human polls just so the bastard can keep their pathetic BCS system and try and please people at the same time.

Boise State, Syracuse, and Kentucky?! Yeah those are the true big name programs in the US. Boise state plays in a micky mouse league and both Cuse and Kentucky put more stock in bball.

I think that whole thing about winning the conference championship is complete BS. It's simply another thing humans perceive and can use as a bias. It would be the same thing to put extra emphasis on if a team won their homecoming. The fact that USC lost to UC-Berkeley is reason enough to have them be 3rd ranked. IMO overall schedual is far more important than artificially "more important" games.

Everyone says the BCS needs to go, but which part? One part is the BCS as a ranking system, the other part is the BCS as a post-season system. On the post season end, i would prefer a playoff because, like it has been said before here, you won't know who would win for sure between 2 teams unless they play. On the ranking end however, i think the BCS is a perfectly fair way to rank teams. The AP polls tried to screw over Oklahoma by ranking USC #1, but the BCS (which takes into account AP polls) still ranked UO #1 and rightly so, they were still the best team (at least as far as rankings can tell, if we had a playoff we'd know for sure). Lastly, USC is not "half winners of the national championship". They got the AP's #1 ranking in a poll, so what?! The BCS takes those polls into account and STILL they were ranked #3. USC doesn't deserve s&!t until they can prove that they could beat either LSU or UO. Oklahoma or LSU is going to be the UNDISPUTED national champion. What do you guys think?

Well i now see that you look down on women and homosexuals. Welcome to UND, eh?

Bison fans: just curious to see what is going to happen to UND now that all the coaches are leaving. Fargo media: there are alot of UND alums in Fargo that had to come here to get jobs.