Bison06

You wear it everywhere when you’re in public?

We’ll expect a photo of yourself wearing goggles then on this forum soon.

Clinician anecdotes can be just as powerful in driving treatment protocols as research. In fact, that is often how new off label therapies are discovered. People tend to hold up research as the only way medicine moves forward, but anyone in that world will tell you that clinical experiences are just as important.

FDA has no political agenda? You clearly don’t follow the pharmaceutical industry closely. 9 out of the last 10 FDA commissioners have left that position to sit as board members for pharmaceutical companies. The FDA is so deep in bed with the pharma industry, they might as well be the same entity.

Why can’t you condemn far left extremists without whataboutisms? Moderately right leaning people like myself have zero problem condemning the extreme right as terrorists and psychopaths. When extremists break laws and create chaos but they play for your team you are somehow ok with it.

You’re the one that seems to get excited that people are breaking the law and destroying property. You defend Antifa and their actions and don’t seem to think that laws and/or punishment have a useful place in society. You’re literally the definition of an anarchist.

So what does that have to do with how destructive they are? Whether they have central leadership or not, they clearly have intentions to wreak havoc and by staying unorganized are even more dangerous as that makes them less predictable.

Serious question, where do you get your news that you have such outlandish views on these things? You claim that Antifa doesn’t exist, I’m not sure any(even far left) news outlets claim that these people don’t exist. Just that they aren’t a single unified, organized group, which is just semantics if you ask me. So where do you get your news that you think Antifa isn’t a real thing?

You actually are incapable of having a civil conversation. I agreed with you and you still act like a child.

I agree with you on the false equivalency. But to be fair, had the building been empty, he still would have been in jail for the rest of his life.

I don't need to pretend. Why would I defend a news station? I'm of the opinion that all of the mainstream media outlets are horrifically biased and impossible to discern what is actually happening by watching them.

If asking pertinent oppositional questions and not letting him get away with what you call obviously false statement isn't being a fair/tough interviewer then I don't know what is. Without it turning into a debate, which isn't his job, what would you like to have seen more of from Wallace? I thought it was a fair interview verging on some tougher questions at times, I certainly wouldn't have characterized it as a softball interview.

It was literally three posts above that that he was responding to and he quoted it in his post. If you're gonna chime in with a cute little comment, maybe at least read the posts that lead to it.

Learn to follow along, the original poster referenced the Chris Wallace interview only and I referenced the Chris Wallace interview only.

I can tell by your comment you didn't actually watch the interview with Chris Wallace.

Not sure why I expected a sincere answer. You’re right, his record stretches decades and it isn’t good. Get a new schtick man, one trick ponies are for the circus.

I get that many people on the left are voting against Trump vs for Biden, but doesn’t it concern you in the slightest(I assume you’d vote for Biden) to be voting for someone who is unwilling to publicly articulate his platform?

Do we honestly think there will be debates? What incentive does Biden have to do them? Keep using covid as the reason to do nothing and keep him in hiding. This gives him the best chance of winning.

So basically, the virus is going to run it's course regardless of the measures we take. Thanks, that's what many have been saying since the beginning of this. Protect the immunocompromised and elderly and let's get back to life so we can develop immunity.

Obama didn't even get 95%

If the polls were so accurate why has there been a consistent conversation the last four years as to how they got it so wrong and how to improve polling? https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/why-2016-election-polls-missed-their-mark/ https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/05/14/can-we-still-trust-polls/ I'm genuinely curious as you seem to be very knowledgeable on polls.

You got your ass kicked a lot when you were younger didn’t you.

A Jewish lawyer in the 70’s at 80’s on the east coast? Not exactly the same as a openly gay Vietnamese immigrant.

I don’t think 2020 is a year to think things won’t happen simply because they haven’t happened before. Five months ago Trump would have won in a landslide. We’ll see where he is at come November, that’s still a long ways off.

Let’s be clear, I don’t believe that ones sexual orientation or race define them in any way at all. In fact I believe the exact opposite. What I’m telling you is that the belief system of the far right, DOES judge people on the above categories. In fact they make it pretty clear how they feel about minorities and homosexuals. What an odd an example to use since Ray Cohn wasn’t openly gay and they really didn’t find out he was gay until after he died. Also, not a minority.