Hypothetically, let's say Hakstol's team made it to the championship game every year for the next 4 years, but lost the final game each of those years. Would you say it's time for him to go?
My opinion is that it's ridiculous for fans to expect national titles in a one-and-done playoff format. This is hockey. There's a reason the NHL plays 7-game series to determine the best team in each round. Does anybody believe the NCAA championship winners would have looked the same over the past 10 years if a 3 or 5 or 7 game series were used to determine the winner each round?
Personally, I'd like to take my chances with a guy who has proven he'll have our team in the hunt pretty much every year. As long as that continues to be the case, I'd let him have the job for as long as he wants it, and I'd also be willing to bet he'll win one or two (maybe more) before all is said and done.