Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Siouxperman8

Members
  • Posts

    2,929
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Everything posted by Siouxperman8

  1. disagree. Eat it in that situation
  2. Should be able to just run it out
  3. Fake pitch and naked boot for a first down
  4. Up 19-17. We have ball on own 18. 3:53 left
  5. Should have challenged spot.
  6. Looks like knee
  7. you can't throw into 5 defenders and one receiver
  8. TD. Down 17-16. Bad bad decision on the throw
  9. 2nd and goal from 2 inch line
  10. PSU at 2
  11. Interception. Threw into 5 defenders
  12. Lucky guy.
  13. thanks
  14. Watch BigSky had an iphone app. Do you know if eversport does?
  15. question for viewing Saturday. Does the Watch BigSky app still work?
  16. What the Alerus needs is more wins and the rest will take care of itself. It isn't my favorite place to watch a game but it sure was a great atmosphere for some of those playoff games in early 2000's.
  17. I don't think that option was available from the BSC.
  18. and UND couldn't go to the Summit and pass up a chance on a home for the football team.
  19. we should let it die and it's time to move on
  20. Surprises me. Not sure if Labat was in on many snaps on Saturday but he didn't have a tackle from what I can see in the stats. Dayo had 5 tackles including a sack.
  21. I haven't seen anything from Klieman that I would consider out of line or low class regarding the game.
  22. Even if the game had been remotely competitive that is a bad decision by 87 and a very dangerous play at best. Shouldn't be ignored and the fact that the kid feels bad doesn't do anything. The time for considering that is before you make the decision to do what he did.
  23. The shoulders might have been above the waist (not convinced myself) but 87's movement was downward and toward his knees and legs as he made contact. That play is very dangerous (and against the rules) and a player needs to recognize that and pull up. It would have been different if he had been closer and able to deliver a blow to his back that pushed him forward. That is merely a block in the back. That play he made has a high likelihood of hurting someone as you roll down into his legs. It was really a bad decision and Arnell get's to pay for it.
  24. Deflect all you want about someone wearing a hat but it doesn't change anything about that play. Lowering a shoulder into the back of a players legs is dangerous and against the rules for that reason. Anybody that is being honest knows that is a dirty play at worst and a very poor decision at best. It was a spur of the moment decision but a very bad one. There is no place for that in a football game. To say otherwise is disingenuous or a complete lack of understanding of sportsmanship and football in general.
  25. I don't have the video. Maybe you can find it. I watched the game on line and couldn't record it. I did watch it live and the saw the replay right afterward and posted that it was an intent to injure at that time. Not sure what other evidence you are looking for. It has nothing to do with who won the game or being a sore loser. It was a bad decision on a players part that broke another players leg.
×
×
  • Create New...