The pictures mainly show what has not been seen/done in decades. The new pictues, IMHO based on posts made on this forum, were created by a (the) name changer(s) when no evidence to support his (their) accusations of hostility and abuse were found.
Bloggers? The only time I've read one is in a case such as this, someone posted the link. I wish I hadn't bothered. But I do have to admit seeing GK's work being cited as fact did make me laugh out loud.