Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

SKondrashkin

Members
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

SKondrashkin's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

  • One Year In
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Collaborator
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

  1. I've been resigned to believing this season will likely be Blake's last, but I'm more optimistic now. After this weekend it's obvious, and I mean really obvious, he needs to diversify his game before even thinking about turning pro. His talent is immense, yet not to the degree he can rely on his free-wheeling skills at the next level alone. CC's extremely structured defensive system thoroughly nullified his game , and he seemingly had no clue how to adapt which led to frustration and turnover after turnover.
  2. Guys like Jamernik and Steph Pattyn’s numbers don't scream good players either if Johannes is Judd’s replacement, I love it. Nothing personal against Caulfield, but he was the embodiment of this year’s squad…. inconsistent and always left you wanting more. Johannes looks to be a no-nonsense, big, mean, intense and physical player who can add some points here and there. Hopefully with his age and experience he can add some leadership too; something this years team was sorely lacking as well.
  3. Assuming Caulfield stays, i wouldnt mind: Blake-McLaughlin-James Gaber-Berg-Perron Caulfield-Schmaltz-Emerson Strinden-Jamernik-Kunz/Ness
  4. ...and highlighted is the bizarre part; because everything fit together perfectly last year once they found their footing half-way through. They're essentially the same team that won the conference minus Ford and Driscoll. Sure they likely overachieved last year a little, but in no parallel universe should they be this bad.
  5. It would be a godsend if Frisch returned. Caulfield would be a welcomed return, but nothing vital. Can't imagine Johnson not going portal. Best case scenario, at least starting out: Portal Hellsten Portal Johnson Frisch - Moore Strathmann - Bast Wiebe - Livanavage (Komzak, Benoit) Blake - McLaughlin - Perron Gaber - Schmaltz - James Emerson - Jamernik - Caulfield Strinden - Costantini - Portz (Ness, Kunz, Croal, Montgomery)
  6. Our troubles don’t stem from what other teams are doing. Our problems are almost always a result of self-inflicted mistakes —> A lack of attention to detail, lack of poise, can’t play a full 60, not learning from mistakes, etc. etc.
  7. On paper this team is far better than average. Talent wise they;re better and more experienced than last year; a team that won the NCHC. Driscoll and Ford are the only significant loses considering Sanderson didn't play the entire 2nd half and Calder was useless after the Goofs nearly slashed his arm off midseason. It's basically the exact same D-core as the 2nd half of last year when they went on a massive winning streak en route to the league title. Last year they looked great, this year they're aweful. It's so perplexing.
  8. Huh? What do you think happened last year? They were a pedestrian 13-10-0 through late January. From that point they went 9-2-1 to finish the regular season enroute to an NCHC title. What's perplexing is they did it with the exact same D-core they have now as Sanderson was injured. I'm not ready to write this team off just yet, but, man, they better turn it around fast. They can't dig themselves into too big a hole.
  9. This is a top 10 team on paper. Unfortunately, this group lacks any resemblance of confidence, poise and composure. All games have ups and downs; but this team folds whenever momentum is lost. They start playing to not makes mistakes, which actually ensures tenative play and mistakes a plenty. It's like watching a deer in headlights the second anything goes wrong. Sure they've come back from some deficits, but most of those deficits should not have existed in the first place. Their continued inability to play a full 60 is astounding.
  10. Well of course. All of this is an entangled web of legal intricacies. But that doesn't nullify the gist of the problem. WTF is Berry's daughter doing registering NODAK; at a time when the NODAK jerseys were set to make a lot of money? And with the assistance of Tarek Howard? Even if UND has found no legal impropriety, questions still need to be answered. Furthermore, if UND had sole rights to the trademark, why even negotiate with Nodak LLC? Like a previous poster said, I'm not in the "Fire Berry Crowd", but, man, Berry has some splainin' to do. At least for transparency's sake.
  11. Incorrect. Just spent some time researching trademarks over the lunch-hour. You can't register a trademark without owning it first. The difficulty here is a word can be owned and trademarked by anybody; especially in the way Nodak LLC registered 'NODAK'. From their application: 'The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color." It all comes down to how a word is used. An existing owner can prevent other business from using a word/trademark only if they sell the same product or service. Companies making different products can use identical word/trademarks. For example Crest Toothpaste and Crest Construction. But this is where it gets potentially nefarious. Trademark registration applicants must declare what goods and services the word/trademark is used in conjunction with. NODAK LLC's was for apparel, clothing, etc; basically anything you can find at the Sioux Shop. WTF? But, UND also owns the NODAK 'moniker' because they were the first to use it. HOWEVER, because they didn't register it, their usage rights are restricted to the geographic area they do business. Registering a trademark ensures national rights.
  12. Park is a nice get. But ironically, for all the talk of Michigan’s recruiting prowess, I’d easily take our future recruits over theirs. Especially the higher-end guys: Wilson, Burchill, Cerbone, Moldenhauer, Cerrato, Park, Spitznagel vs Strathmann, Livanavage, Wiebe, Mcinnis, Perron, Swanson, Boisvert
  13. Geno left most recruiting duties to his assistants. It’s no surprise recruiting took a nose dive when Dean Blais and John Marks left; culminating in 3 sub .500 seasons a few years later (early 90s)
  14. At the very least, the bottom 2 lines should be set in stone as Senden-Jammer-Hain and Albrecht-Ness-Portz. That gives the forwards a solid defensive foundation (if they play to potential) who can play against any line. It's a total waste to bring someone like Senden back and play him in a role he's not suited to play (like with McLaughlin and Gaber saturday). Hell, it wouldve been better to keep Adam Calder instead.
×
×
  • Create New...